Finding Zero Potential between Two Charges: Using the V=kQ/d Equation

AI Thread Summary
To find the point where electric potential is zero between two charges, the equation V = kQ/d should be used for both charges, and their potentials should be summed and set to zero. The user initially confused potential with potential energy and work, which are related but distinct concepts. Understanding that potential is energy per charge clarifies its application in electric fields. The discussion emphasizes that finding the zero potential point also indicates where the forces between the charges cancel out. This approach simplifies the problem without needing to directly calculate forces.
Innuendo
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm supposed to look for where the potential is zero on the same line where two different charges lie.
I'm given the values of the two charges and the distance between them, I have to find where the potential is zero.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm thinking about using the equation
W = kQ1Q2 ( 1/d1 - 1/d2)
I tried plugging in for Q1 and Q2 and the given distance into either d1 or d2. Where's my mistake? Or I'm supposed to use another equation? Also, is the W the same as the required "potential?"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Potential energy(and potential!) and work are not the same thing, but they're related in these cases when dealing with electric fields(and also gravitational fields)

More importantly you appear to have also confused potential and potential energy

Do you know the equation for potential? You can write an equation for both charges, add them and set them equal to 0 to solve for the required position

As far as the difference between PE and work in a conservative force field(like gravity or electric fields)if you change something's potential energy you have DONE work to it against its respective force field

The potential function is technically potential energy per charge in an electric field, which is a little abstract, and it may not seem obvious why it's useful, but look at this problem. You found where the potential is 0, so you know F=-grad(potential) so you've actually found where the force cancels out between the two of them, without having to screw around with the force equation(and also from that equation you know wherever the potential is constant the force also equals 0
 
Last edited:
Thank you for clearing that up. I'm using the V=kQ/d equation now. I'm actually working on the same problem as the one another user has asked about. But I got it now, thanks.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top