Findng electric force for line of charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric force acting on an electron positioned at a distance "d" from the midpoint of a uniformly charged line of length "L" on the x-axis. The participants clarify that the linear charge density (λ) is used to express the differential charge (dq) as λdx, and they discuss the integration limits from -L/2 to L/2. There is confusion regarding the correct expression for the distance "r" in Coulomb's law, with participants debating whether it should be represented as (d-x) or (d+x). The importance of considering the force as a vector and integrating its components is emphasized, particularly noting that the angle between the electron and the line of charge is zero. The conversation highlights the need for careful application of Coulomb's law in this context.
lonewolf219
Messages
186
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Find the force acting on an electron located "d" distance from the midpoint of a line of charge, length "L", located on the x axis. The line of charge is positive.


Homework Equations



F(e)=kq1q2/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



λ=linear density, here the charge is uniform.
So, dq=λdx I think?
The distance is the variable that is changing, so we should integrate the dx and the limits should be over the length of the line?

k, e(electron) and λ are constant and can be brought out of integral... if the origin is the midpoint, then the limits of integration are -L/2 to L/2? The solution the book gives is the following:

4keλL/(4d^2-L^2)

I don't know where I'm going wrong with this equation, maybe I have the wrong r value?
Is r=(d-x)^2 when dx is along the positive x axis?
Any tips or perspectives would be great!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi lonewolf219! :smile:
lonewolf219 said:
So, dq=λdx I think?

yes
Is r=(d-x)^2 when dx is along the positive x axis?

how can a distance equal a distance squared? :confused:

(and don't forget that force is a vector, so you'll need to integrate the component :wink:)
 
Ah, yes, that's why I prefer energy! The electron is also along the x axis, so the angle between the line and the electron is 0, so cos(0)=1?

Using Coulomb's formula, where denominator "r" is squared. The distance between the electron and a dx element of the line (?) can be represented by what? Is it d-x, where we don't know the value of x? Or d+x?
 
lonewolf219 said:
Using Coulomb's formula, where denominator "r" is squared. The distance between the electron and a dx element of the line (?) can be represented by what? Is it d-x, where we don't know the value of x? Or d+x?

ah, i think the question means that the electron is on the y axis
The electron is also along the x axis, so the angle between the line and the electron is 0, so cos(0)=1?

see above :wink:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top