Finite square well ##\psi(x)## solution for ##-a < x < a##

gfd43tg
Gold Member
Messages
947
Reaction score
48
Hello, in Griffith's section on the Finite Square Well, ##\psi(x)## (what is the name of this anyway?, I know ##\Psi(x,t)## is called the wave function but how do I call just ##\psi(x)##?)

Anyways,

The solution is
upload_2015-3-4_22-45-2.png

For x < a and x > a, the terms that are infinite as x approaches infinity are said to be not physical, so the author concludes that they are not part of the solution, however that should not be the case here.

Then he clumps all the solutions together
upload_2015-3-4_22-46-36.png

But what happened to the sine term in the region 0 < x < a??
 

Attachments

  • upload_2015-3-4_21-11-45.png
    upload_2015-3-4_21-11-45.png
    22.5 KB · Views: 496
  • upload_2015-3-4_21-12-8.png
    upload_2015-3-4_21-12-8.png
    37.8 KB · Views: 549
Physics news on Phys.org
##\Psi(x,t)## is a time-depemdent wave function, ##\psi(x)## is a time-independent wave function / stationary state.

Since the Schroedinger equation is linear, if you have a solution of the type ##\psi(x) = \phi_1(x) + \phi_2(x)##, you can study the two ##\phi_i(x)## separately, and then recombine the results. It is true that the full, general, solution is the one with sine and cosine, but to understand the physics it's enough to work out the rest of the calculations just for one of the two, which simplifies the math. If you try to redo the calculations with the sine, you will see that Eq.[2.154] will become ##k = - l \cot(la)## , ...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
696
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top