Finite subgroups of unique orders are normal

  • Thread starter Thread starter redone632
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finite Normal
redone632
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let G be a finite group and H a subgroup of G having order m. Show that if H is the only subgroup of order m in G, then H is normal in G.


Homework Equations


A subgroup H of G is normal in G if and only if xHx^{-1} \subseteq H \forall x \in G


The Attempt at a Solution


Suppose that H is the only subgroup of order m. Then elements in G\H cannot have order m.

If x \in H then clearly, xHx^{-1} \subseteq H

If x \notin H that is, x \in G \backslash H so |x| \neq m then ...

This is where I'm not seeing anything. Any help to point me in the right direction would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is xHx^(-1) a subgroup? How many elements does it have?
 
Dick said:
Is xHx^(-1) a subgroup? How many elements does it have?

Since H is a subgroup of order m, xHx^(-1) will be a subgroup of order m. Since H is the only subgroup of order m there will be no other subgroup such that xKx^(-1) is of order m. Therefore, xHx^(-1) = H.

I think that's it, but I can't connect the dots to the last statement.
 
I don't see the problem. If xHx^(-1) is a subgroup of order m, and H is the ONLY subgroup of order m, then xHx^(-1) must be the same subgroup as H. What's K got to do with it?
 
Dick said:
I don't see the problem. If xHx^(-1) is a subgroup of order m, and H is the ONLY subgroup of order m, then xHx^(-1) must be the same subgroup as H. What's K got to do with it?

Oh wow, I swear I miss the most obvious things. Thanks for your help again!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top