Fire - AND - Electric fields within matter

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of fire, specifically focusing on the ionization of gases within flames and the role of electric fields. Participants explore the physics behind the behavior of atoms in fire, contrasting chemical explanations with physical interpretations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant references Griffiths, noting that atoms can be ionized by electric fields, but questions whether fire itself produces electric fields or if heat alone is responsible for ionization.
  • Another participant argues that gases can become ionized through high temperatures due to energetic collisions, suggesting this is a more accurate description of what occurs in a fire.
  • A third participant simplifies the concept of fire to a chemical reaction, emphasizing the interaction between carbon and oxygen, while referencing a video by Richard Feynman for clarity.
  • One participant challenges the assertion that fire is a highly ionized gas, suggesting that gas molecules in fire are not necessarily ionized and that this would be unusual.
  • Another participant proposes that flames can be considered a plasma, but notes that the level of ionization is typically low, referencing a source that discusses the influence of electric fields on flame plasma.
  • A later reply clarifies that the light from flames is primarily due to heated soot rather than plasma, and discusses the ambiguity in defining plasma based on ionization levels.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the ionization of gases in fire, with some asserting that fire is a plasma while others contest this characterization. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the extent of ionization in flames and the role of electric fields.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions about the definitions of ionization and plasma, as well as the conditions under which gases become ionized in the context of fire. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of the physical processes involved.

vorcil
Messages
395
Reaction score
0
I've been reading a section on induced dipoles in Griffiths,
It says that although an atom as a whole is electrically neutral, there is a positively charged core and a negatively charged electron cloud, and when the atom is within an electric field the nucleus is pushed in the direction of the field and the electron cloud in the opposite direction. It also says that if the field is strong enough, it can pull the atom apart "Ionizing it"

Somewhere (in high school I think) I was told that fire is a highly ionized gas,

So are electric fields produced by fire? simply by making something hot, like wood, by rubbing it against something to generate the temperature needed for the chemical reactions to take place surely doesn't create electric fields?

I'm not sure, I'm just trying to understand what is actually going on inside fire IN PHYSICS TERMS, all the explanations of fire I can find on the internet are in terms of chemical reactions and such in CHEMISTRY TERMS, and do not exactly explain what is happening to the atoms.

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
While you can ionize atoms with strong electric fields, this is not the only way to ionize atoms. If a gas gets hot enough, then the atoms have enough energy so that the collisions between atoms are violent enough to knock the electrons loose, thereby ionizing them. This is a better description of what happens in a fire.
 
Fire. Photosynthesis in reverse. It's all about atoms of carbon and atoms of oxygen getting awfully excited about being re-united back into carbon dioxide. There are several versions of this basic clip of Richard Feynman explaining it. You should understand that in this clip, Feynman is deliberately making it simple for laymen like me. But the basic point is well made.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1pIYI5JQLE&p=629C9280033D7C40&playnext=1&index=19
 
However, I don't believe that your original statement, that "fire is highly ionized gas" is true. The molecules of a gas in fire are not necessarily ionized. In fact, I suspect that would be very unusual.
 
I think that a flame is a plasma - i.e. an ionized gas. However, it is typically not "highly ionized", meaning that the percentage of the atoms which are ionized is very small. Here is a reference, which shows the plasma of a flame being influenced by an E-Field.

http://www.plasma-universe.com/Flame
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The light given off by a flame is not the result of a plasma, it is the result of little bits of material (soot) getting very hot and glowing.

Although there will be some ionization in the combustion products the degree of ionization is pretty low. Of course, exactly where you draw the line for how much ionization is required before you call something a plasma is a little ambiguous, so some people will call it a plasma and some will not. If it is a plasma it is barely a plasma and only exhibits the characteristic behaviors of a plasma very weakly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K