Fire Truck Problem: Inertia, Effect & More

  • Thread starter Thread starter Taturana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fire Truck
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dynamics of water in a fire truck's tank during braking, focusing on inertia, momentum, and Newton's laws. When the tank is half-full, water movement creates waves that can cause the truck to rock back and forth upon stopping. In contrast, a full tank behaves like a solid, resulting in smoother braking but increased stopping distance due to greater momentum. With a tank 90% full, the effects vary depending on the truck's speed; slow braking leads to wave formation, while fast braking can cause erratic water motion and instability. The conversation highlights the complexities of fluid dynamics in relation to vehicle motion and braking.
Taturana
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
Suppose a fire truck, with a huge tank of water. If the tank is half-full, when you slow down the water's inertia is going to push the truck forward. When it's full, the water can be thought like a solid, so it doesn't have the same effect.

The question is: what are the concepts involved in this problem? If the tank is, say, 90% filled, is it going to have more or less effect than when it's half-full (by "effect" I mean, how the water movement will affect the truck brake).

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Firstly, inertia will not push anything forward or in anyway. You must understand that inertia is the 'reluctance of an object to change in its state of motion or rest' which is derived from Newton's First Law of Motion.

To visit the problem of the Firetruck, you must look at it at many angles, namely: Inertia, Momentum, Newton's Laws of Motion and Wave.

It is important that you isolate the system under investigation for motion which is the tank with water itself (Presumably in rectangular prism shape).




1) In the 1st case (50% full)


When the tank comes to a stop, the water will decelerate an the force it applies to the front wall of the tank will be equal to the rate of change in momentum.

Now, water waves will be formed due to the forward motion of the water at the back of the tank due to inertia; and the force the water tank applies to the water body due to Newton's Third Law of Motion. This will create the 'motion'.

At the same time, if you look at the truck stopping motion, you will expect to see it rocks back and forth (even though you are unlikely to see it due to dampers) when it comes to a completes stop because of forced oscillation (in this case, the driving force comes from the periodic waves of the water body).



2) In the 2nd case (full)

What you have mentioned is not wrong, the water body and the tank is taken to be a solid. As such, no wave formation is possible. It's important for you to remember that liquid is incompressible so no longitudinal wave is possible.

As a result, the truck stopping motion would be smooth and no 'jerkiness'. There is also another difference in the stopping motion. Due to the larger mass of the water, the momentum of the truck will be much larger. As such, given the same braking force, the duration of braking and distance of braking will be longer (related to Momentum).



3) In the last case (90%)

This is tricky for comparison as no values of motion, dimension of the tank or mass is given for context.

Why this information is important because there are 2 possible situations:

A. The truck moves slowly and brakes.

Given the small initial momentum and small inertia, the water body will form waves and the observations are very similar to the 1st case, albeit more vigorous due to larger momentum.

B. The truck moves very fast and brakes.

In this case, the initial momentum and inertia are huge. As such, the water ripples are large. This is when the problems come in. Firstly, the dimension of the tank will impede such motion. This will result in forces acting in different directions, other than the horizontal direction. The truck will become more 'shaky'. Due to these impediment, the motion of the water also becomes more erratic and unpredictable (relate to Fluid Mechanics).

I would say the 'motion' is more because of 2 reasons:
- The huge initial Kinetic Energy causes the water body to move around more vigorously and for a longer time
- The movement of the water is much more complex.

I hope this answers your question :)
 
Nguyen Quang said:
Firstly, inertia will not push anything forward or in anyway. You must understand that inertia is the 'reluctance of an object to change in its state of motion or rest' which is derived from Newton's First Law of Motion.

To visit the problem of the Firetruck, you must look at it at many angles, namely: Inertia, Momentum, Newton's Laws of Motion and Wave.

It is important that you isolate the system under investigation for motion which is the tank with water itself (Presumably in rectangular prism shape).




1) In the 1st case (50% full)


When the tank comes to a stop, the water will decelerate an the force it applies to the front wall of the tank will be equal to the rate of change in momentum.

Now, water waves will be formed due to the forward motion of the water at the back of the tank due to inertia; and the force the water tank applies to the water body due to Newton's Third Law of Motion. This will create the 'motion'.

At the same time, if you look at the truck stopping motion, you will expect to see it rocks back and forth (even though you are unlikely to see it due to dampers) when it comes to a completes stop because of forced oscillation (in this case, the driving force comes from the periodic waves of the water body).



2) In the 2nd case (full)

What you have mentioned is not wrong, the water body and the tank is taken to be a solid. As such, no wave formation is possible. It's important for you to remember that liquid is incompressible so no longitudinal wave is possible.

As a result, the truck stopping motion would be smooth and no 'jerkiness'. There is also another difference in the stopping motion. Due to the larger mass of the water, the momentum of the truck will be much larger. As such, given the same braking force, the duration of braking and distance of braking will be longer (related to Momentum).



3) In the last case (90%)

This is tricky for comparison as no values of motion, dimension of the tank or mass is given for context.

Why this information is important because there are 2 possible situations:

A. The truck moves slowly and brakes.

Given the small initial momentum and small inertia, the water body will form waves and the observations are very similar to the 1st case, albeit more vigorous due to larger momentum.

B. The truck moves very fast and brakes.

In this case, the initial momentum and inertia are huge. As such, the water ripples are large. This is when the problems come in. Firstly, the dimension of the tank will impede such motion. This will result in forces acting in different directions, other than the horizontal direction. The truck will become more 'shaky'. Due to these impediment, the motion of the water also becomes more erratic and unpredictable (relate to Fluid Mechanics).

I would say the 'motion' is more because of 2 reasons:
- The huge initial Kinetic Energy causes the water body to move around more vigorously and for a longer time
- The movement of the water is much more complex.

I hope this answers your question :)

This helped. Thank you very much.
 
Google Free surface effect.
 
I think the OP was talking about the water sloshing around in the tank. I would think the tank would have baffles to prevent this.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top