Firing a spherical bullet into a watertank

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheMan112
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bullet Spherical
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the distance a spherical bullet travels when fired into a watertank, considering non-constant acceleration due to drag. The initial approach involves using a retarding force proportional to velocity, leading to a differential equation for motion. Participants suggest integrating the acceleration to find velocity and position, with a correction indicating that the drag force should be modeled as proportional to the square of the velocity for accuracy. The final solution involves integrating the corrected velocity function to determine the distance traveled. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly modeling forces in physics problems.
TheMan112
Messages
42
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] Firing a spherical bullet into a watertank

I've got a problem, involving non-constant acceleration:

If we fire a spherical bullet horizontally into a watertank, how far will the bullet traverse?

I've figured as much that a spherical bullet provides a retarding force:

F = -k \cdot v where k is a constant.

This should provide the following non-constant acceleration due to Newtons 2nd law.

a = \frac{F}{m} = - {\frac{k v}{m}}

I'm thinking I should integrate two times over a(t) to get an expression for x(t), but since "a" is proportional to v(t) and not directly to t, I don't know how to do it without getting a recursive expression.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Horizontally ?

Or perpendicular to a smooth water surface?
 
TheMan112 said:
I'm thinking I should integrate two times over a(t) to get an expression for x(t), but since "a" is proportional to v(t) and not directly to t, I don't know how to do it without getting a recursive expression.

Hi TheMan112! :smile:

Hint: a = dv/dt. :smile:
 
You have an equation with separable variables (the form f(y)dy=g(x)dx). This can be solved by integrating both sides: left from y1 to y2, right from x1 to x2.
Another option is solving for v(x):

dv/dx=dv/dt*dt/dx=(dv/dt)/v

After you get v(x) you can get corresponding t from dt=dx/v.

But I don't think that bullets experience linear drag. At high speeds F=-kv^2 is probably a better apoximation.
 
Last edited:
Alfi said:
Horizontally ?

Or perpendicular to a smooth water surface?

Imagine we mounted the muzzle of a gun to a hole in the side of the watertank, fireing into the water horizontally.

tiny-tim said:
Hi TheMan112! :smile:

Hint: a = dv/dt. :smile:

Haha, I know that, and from the following differential equation...

m\ddot{x}-k\dot{x}=0

...I get:

\frac{dx}{dt} = e^{\frac{m}{k} t}

Which in turn gives:

s = \int_{0}^{\infty} v(t) dt = \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{\frac{m}{k} t} dt = -\frac{m}{k}

Which gives an answer wrong by a factor of 10^3.
 
TheMan112 said:
\frac{dx}{dt} = e^{\frac{m}{k} t}

Which in turn gives:

s = \int_{0}^{\infty} v(t) dt = \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{\frac{m}{k} t} dt = -\frac{m}{k}

Hi TheMan112! :smile:

Somehow you've managed to get a nearly right answer with the wrong reasoning. :rolleyes:

It should be:

\frac{dx}{dt} = v_0 e^{\frac{-k}{m} t}

Which in turn gives:

s = \int_{0}^{\infty} v(t) dt = v_0 \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{\frac{-k}{m} t} dt\,=\,...\,? :smile:
 
Seems like that did it, thanks!
 
Back
Top