Firing a spherical bullet into a watertank

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheMan112
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bullet Spherical
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves analyzing the motion of a spherical bullet fired horizontally into a watertank, focusing on the effects of drag and non-constant acceleration. Participants are exploring the relationship between force, velocity, and acceleration in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration of acceleration to find position, questioning how to handle the non-constant nature of acceleration due to drag. There are also inquiries about the orientation of the bullet's trajectory and the nature of the drag force acting on the bullet.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided hints and alternative approaches to solving the differential equations involved. There is recognition of the complexity of the drag force, with suggestions that a quadratic drag model may be more appropriate than a linear one. Multiple interpretations of the problem setup are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a potential misunderstanding regarding the drag force's dependence on velocity, with participants noting discrepancies in the reasoning leading to incorrect results. The discussion is ongoing, with no clear consensus reached yet.

TheMan112
Messages
42
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] Firing a spherical bullet into a watertank

I've got a problem, involving non-constant acceleration:

If we fire a spherical bullet horizontally into a watertank, how far will the bullet traverse?

I've figured as much that a spherical bullet provides a retarding force:

F = -k \cdot v where k is a constant.

This should provide the following non-constant acceleration due to Newtons 2nd law.

a = \frac{F}{m} = - {\frac{k v}{m}}

I'm thinking I should integrate two times over a(t) to get an expression for x(t), but since "a" is proportional to v(t) and not directly to t, I don't know how to do it without getting a recursive expression.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Horizontally ?

Or perpendicular to a smooth water surface?
 
TheMan112 said:
I'm thinking I should integrate two times over a(t) to get an expression for x(t), but since "a" is proportional to v(t) and not directly to t, I don't know how to do it without getting a recursive expression.

Hi TheMan112! :smile:

Hint: a = dv/dt. :smile:
 
You have an equation with separable variables (the form f(y)dy=g(x)dx). This can be solved by integrating both sides: left from y1 to y2, right from x1 to x2.
Another option is solving for v(x):

dv/dx=dv/dt*dt/dx=(dv/dt)/v

After you get v(x) you can get corresponding t from dt=dx/v.

But I don't think that bullets experience linear drag. At high speeds F=-kv^2 is probably a better apoximation.
 
Last edited:
Alfi said:
Horizontally ?

Or perpendicular to a smooth water surface?

Imagine we mounted the muzzle of a gun to a hole in the side of the watertank, fireing into the water horizontally.

tiny-tim said:
Hi TheMan112! :smile:

Hint: a = dv/dt. :smile:

Haha, I know that, and from the following differential equation...

m\ddot{x}-k\dot{x}=0

...I get:

\frac{dx}{dt} = e^{\frac{m}{k} t}

Which in turn gives:

s = \int_{0}^{\infty} v(t) dt = \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{\frac{m}{k} t} dt = -\frac{m}{k}

Which gives an answer wrong by a factor of 10^3.
 
TheMan112 said:
\frac{dx}{dt} = e^{\frac{m}{k} t}

Which in turn gives:

s = \int_{0}^{\infty} v(t) dt = \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{\frac{m}{k} t} dt = -\frac{m}{k}

Hi TheMan112! :smile:

Somehow you've managed to get a nearly right answer with the wrong reasoning. :rolleyes:

It should be:

\frac{dx}{dt} = v_0 e^{\frac{-k}{m} t}

Which in turn gives:

s = \int_{0}^{\infty} v(t) dt = v_0 \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{\frac{-k}{m} t} dt\,=\,...\,? :smile:
 
Seems like that did it, thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
844
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K