Quantum First edition of Ballentine's Quantum Mechanics book

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the various editions of Ballentine's "Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development." The user received a hardcover edition with ISBN 9789810227074, which is identified as an earlier edition compared to the more commonly found version with ISBN 978-9810241056. It is noted that the book was originally published in 1998, with the author indicating in the preface that this edition includes significant new material. The conversation highlights that revisions can occur without being labeled as new editions unless substantial changes are made, such as adding or reorganizing chapters. The 1990 edition is referenced as the first edition, while the 2014 edition is recognized as the second, primarily adding a chapter on quantum information. The user expresses satisfaction with the writing style of their edition and questions whether the price difference for the second edition is justified.
marco21
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi. I just received a copy of Ballentine's "Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development" ordered from Amazon, after I heard well of it in this site. I'm wondering what edition I've bought: the one I've got has a white hardcover, and its ISBN is 9789810227074.
Does someone ever used this edition? Why when I look at stores all the copies of this book come with a different cover and/or ISBN (for example: 978-9810241056)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just from the isbn I’d say you’ve got an earlier edition. I think isbns are requested from some authority and the value always increases as time goes along.

Isn’t there some publishing on the flip side of the title page? You might find a year published.
 
The book was published in 1998, as the first (perhaps?) edition, but the author states in the preface that "This edition contains a considerable amount of new material". I got it at a very low price compared to the fancy-colored-cover edition (twenty euros vs. sixty plus something) and I was curious to know why. Maybe this printing has typos inside?
 
Yes revisions are done as needed and often just published without saying that it’s a new edition as they deemed the changes small. When chapters are added, dropped or reorganized then it’s a new edition.
 
In the preface of the 1998 edition of his book, Ballentine references an older 1990 edition of the book as "first edition". The current edition with the added "second edition" in the title is from 2014. So there are actually three editions which are referenced confusingly.

The differences between the 1990 and the 1998 editions seem to be substancial. The differences between the 1998 and the 2014 edition seem to be mostly the added chapter on quantum information. Here's a thread about the appearance of the current edition.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
It seems that the edition I got is the hardcover edition published in may 1998. I find the book very well-written, and, at least the very first chapters, a very peaceful reading. Does buying the second edition worth the difference in price?
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top