First order correction of wavefunction in degenerate perturbation

zhanhai
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
In first order correction of wavefunction,

(1)n>=∑ψ(0)m(0)m|V|ψ(0)n>/(E(0)n−E(0)m)

when any two of the original states degenerate, we replace the two states with their corresponding "good states" to get a new set of "undisturbed" states (ψ(0)m), AND then we determine the first order correction of each of the "good states" using the above expression with respect to the new set of "undisturbed" states. Is this understanding correct?

(I have read throught several textbooks for this, and have found no clear description.)
 
Last edited:
zhanhai said:
In first order correction of wavefunction,

(1)n>=∑ψ(0)m(0)m|V|ψ(0)n>/(E(0)n−E(0)m)

when any two of the original states degenerate, we replace the two states with their corresponding "good states" to get a new set of "undisturbed" states (ψ(0)m), AND then we determine the first order correction of each of the "good states" using the above expression with respect to the new set of "undisturbed" states. Is this understanding correct?
If by "good states" you mean the linear combinations obtained from the secluar equations after solving for ##E^{(1)}##, then yes, that is correct.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top