First-order differential equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a ball thrown upward from a height, subject to gravitational and air resistance forces, modeled by a first-order differential equation. The objective is to determine the time it takes for the ball to hit the ground.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to analyze the motion in two parts: the ascent and descent of the ball, applying the method of integrating factors to solve the differential equations for each phase. Some participants question the necessity of the differential equation for the falling phase, while others discuss the implications of the signs in the equations related to air resistance and gravity.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the equations and the physical meaning behind the terms involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the treatment of forces and the signs in the equations, but there is no explicit consensus on the approach or the reasoning behind the results.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the signs of the gravitational force in the context of the ball's motion, particularly when considering the direction of forces during ascent and descent. Participants are also reflecting on previous experiences with similar differential equations.

DivGradCurl
Messages
364
Reaction score
0
"A ball with mass 0.15 kg is thrown upward with initial velocity 20 m/s from the roof of a building 30 m heigh. There is a force due to air resistance of \left| v \right|/30 where the velocity v is measured in m/s. Find the time that the ball hits the ground." (Answer: 5.129 s)

I split the problem into two parts---namely, the way up and down. From the former, I get the time for the ball to reach the maximum height. Then, I use the latter to find the answer.

If we measure x positively upward from the ground, then

m\frac{dv}{dt}=-mg-\frac{v}{30}, \qquad v(0) = v_0, \qquad x(0)=x_0

\frac{dv}{dt} + \frac{v}{30m}=-g

The Method of Integrating Factors gives

\mu = \exp \left( \frac{1}{30m} \int dt \right) =\exp \left( \frac{t}{30m} \right)

v(t)=\exp \left( -\frac{t}{30m} \right) \int -g\exp \left( \frac{t}{30m} \right) \: dt

v(t)=\exp \left( -\frac{t}{30m} \right) \left[ -g(30m) \exp \left( \frac{t}{30m} \right) + \mathrm{C} \right]

v(t)=-30gm + \mathrm{C} \exp \left( -\frac{t}{30m} \right)

Next, we apply the initial condition in order to find the constant.

v(0) = v_0 \Rightarrow \mathrm{C} = v_0 + 30 gm

Thus, we obtain

v(t) = -30gm + \left( v_0 + 30 gm \right) \exp \left( -\frac{t}{30m} \right)

At the maximum height, we have

\frac{dx}{dt}=v=0

which gives

t_{\mbox{up}} = 30m \ln \left( \frac{v_0}{30gm} + 1 \right)

The way down is described as follows:

m\frac{dv}{dt}=-mg+\frac{v}{30}, \qquad v\left( t_{\mbox{up}} \right) = 0, \qquad x\left( t_{\mbox{up}} \right) = x_{\mbox{max}}

\frac{dv}{dt} - \frac{v}{30m}=-g

The Method of Integrating Factors gives

\mu = \exp \left( -\frac{1}{30m} \int dt \right) =\exp \left( -\frac{t}{30m} \right)

v(t)=\exp \left( \frac{t}{30m} \right) \int -g \exp \left( -\frac{t}{30m} \right) \: dt

v(t)=\exp \left( \frac{t}{30m} \right) \left[ -g (-30m) \exp \left( -\frac{t}{30m} \right) + \mathrm{C} \right]

v(t)= 30mg + \mathrm{C}\exp \left( \frac{t}{30m} \right)

Next, we apply the initial condition in order to find the constant.

v\left( t_{\mbox{up}} \right) = 0 \Rightarrow \mathrm{C} = -\frac{(30mg) ^2}{v_0 + 30mg}

Thus, we obtain

v(t)= 30mg -\frac{(30mg) ^2}{v_0 + 30mg} \exp \left( \frac{t}{30m} \right)

and so

\int v(t) \: dt = 30mg\int dt -\frac{(30mg) ^2}{v_0 + 30mg} \int \exp \left( \frac{t}{30m} \right) \: dt

x(t)= 30mgt -\frac{(30m) ^3 g^2}{v_0 + 30mg} \exp \left( \frac{t}{30m} \right) + \mathrm{C}

Next, we apply the initial condition in order to find the constant.

x\left( t_{\mbox{up}} \right) = x_{\mbox{max}} \Rightarrow \mathrm{C} = x_{\mbox{max}} + (30m)^2 g - (30m)^2 g \ln \left( \frac{v_0}{30mg} + 1 \right)

Thus, we obtain

x(t)= 30mgt -\frac{(30m) ^3 g^2}{v_0 + 30mg} \exp \left( \frac{t}{30m} \right) + x_{\mbox{max}} + (30m)^2 g - (30m)^2 g \ln \left( \frac{v_0}{30mg} + 1 \right)

When the ball hits the ground, x(t)=0. Solving for t gives t \approx 4.429 \mbox{ s}. The result is clearly wrong, but there is something even more weird than that. Using x(t) (way up) gives the right answer! In other words

v(t) = -30gm + \left( v_0 + 30 gm \right) \exp \left( -\frac{t}{30m} \right)

gives

\int v(t) \: dt = -30gm \int dt + \left( v_0 + 30 gm \right) \int \exp \left( -\frac{t}{30m} \right) \: dt

x(t) = -30gmt -30m \left( v_0 + 30 gm \right) \exp \left( -\frac{t}{30m} \right) + \mathrm{C}

Next, we apply the initial condition in order to find the constant.

x(0) = x_0 \Rightarrow \mathrm{C} = x_0 + 30m \left( v_0 + 30gm \right)

x(t) = x_0 -30gmt + 30m \left( v_0 + 30 gm \right) \left[ 1 - \exp \left( -\frac{t}{30m} \right) \right]

Again, setting x(t)=0 and solving for t gives t \approx 5.129 \mbox{ s}. Can anybody please explain me why this is happening? From what I have, it seems that the differential equation that models the ball falling is not necessary, which is strange.

Any help is highly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's good that you noted the resistance is always opposite to the direction of motion.
You actually made it too difficult for yourself. You need only one equation

ma=-mg-v/30
which is your first one.
The minus sign in front of the resistance term automatically makes it opposed to the direction of motion.
Since you've chosen the positive direction upwards. Now, when the ball rises v is positive so the resistance force is negative (downwards).
When the ball falls v is negative and the resistance force is positive (upwards). So you don't need to fuss with signs. You probably mistakenly assumed v to be always positive or something.
 
Oh, sure! The reason why I posted this question is because the other day I was solving a similar DE where there was a v^2 term. It's clear to me now.

Thanks
 
Hello, I have just worked this problem and had issue with getting 5.129s as an answer also. The only thing i don't understand is why the differential equation has -mg and not mg. Shouldn't this term be mg if the ball is falling because gravity is speeding it up not slowing it down?Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K