First order phase transition (van der waals gas)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the physical explanations of the graphs in the referenced lecture notes, specifically regarding the behavior of Vg and Vl with temperature changes. Vg decreases with temperature while Vl increases, which is linked to the Maxwell construction and the behavior of the p-V curve as it approaches the critical point. As temperature rises, the loops in the theoretical p-V curve diminish until they vanish at the critical point, causing Vg and Vl to coalesce. This coalescence results in a decrease in the distance between Vg and Vl with increasing temperature. Understanding these relationships is crucial for grasping the underlying thermodynamic principles.
jasony
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I am looking at some of the notes but don't quite understand this.

What are the physical explanation of the graphs (Fig 4(a) and 4(b)) on Page 4 ?
http://www.pma.caltech.edu/~mcc/Ph127/b/Lecture3.pdf"

Why V_{g} decreases with temperature but V_{l} increases with temperature?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone who can help? please...
 
Look at the Maxwell construction: When the temperature rises, the two loops in the theoretical p-V curve become less and less pronounced until they disappear at the critical point. At the critical point Vg and Vl coalesce, hence the distance of Vg and Vl has to decrease with temperature.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top