Fizeau, 1851, drag coefficinet

  • Thread starter Thread starter callejon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drag
callejon
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Has Fizeau changed the direction of the water in his experiment?

If no, wenn we change the direction of the water, is it true that we get twice as much change in fringes?

I mean, when we compare the fringes when there are 2 directions of water, is the change more than when we compare one dircetion and no movement of water?

Because I've never read that the direction of water was changed and my teacher says now that it was changed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't been able to find much in the way of reliable information on Fizeau's experiment. Google finds a bunch of crank webpages full of misinformation and little else. The sci.physics.faq on the experimental basis of relativity has only this to say:

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html#2. early experiments

Fizeau -- Measured the speed of light in moving materials. The Fresnel drag coefficient is solidly established by experiments, and is consistent with SR to within experimental resolutions.
 
Last edited:
callejon said:
is it true that we get twice as much change in fringes [..] when we compare the fringes [between] 2 directions of water[ versus] one dircetion and no movement of water?

Yes, that is the correct understanding but I don't know whether any particular person has bothered to perform that specific check (since there is no obvious reason to doubt it). On the other hand, why don't you just look up Fizeau's original results (using babelfish if necessary); wouldn't it be surprising if someone went to all the effort of preparing an appropriate apparatus and then only used it for flows in one direction?
 
Last edited:
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Back
Top