Floating speck of dust with charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a problem involving a charged speck of dust floating above an infinite charged plane. The participants agree that the gravitational force acting on the speck must equal the electrostatic force repelling it. They initially attempted to use the formula for point charges, but realized it was inappropriate due to the infinite plane's characteristics. The correct formula for the electrostatic force in this scenario is F = q1σ/(2ε0), which does not depend on distance. This clarification is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
roz77
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
So this is a problem my friend was doing. I don't remember the specific values for the variables, but it should be ok. There is a speck of dust floating above an infinite plane. The speck of dust has a charge q1. The plane has a charge density of sigma= xC/m^2. What is the mass of the speck of dust?

So we talked about it. We assumed that since the speck of dust is floating, the gravitational force downward should equal the electrostatic force that was repelling the dust. So we tried setting kq1q2/r^2 equal to mg, but there is no distance given. We weren't really sure how to proceed, and that's as far as we got. My friend has a test on this stuff tomorrow night, so I am tryin to help him out.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The formula you used only applies to two point charges. In the case of infinite plane, the electrostatic repulsion force is

F = \frac{q_1 \sigma}{2\epsilon_0}

independent of any distance. The rest of discussion about the gravitational force is correct.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top