Flow in a pipe with a tank on its top, and a nozzle on its bottom

AI Thread Summary
To achieve 1000 rpm from a Pelton turbine using a tank of water, the height of water (h) in the tank and the nozzle diameter are critical factors. The nozzle must be sized to minimize flow restriction while maximizing water speed, which is influenced by the turbine specifications and the tank height. Maintaining the outlet diameter of the pipe can help reduce flow restriction. The feasibility of reaching 1000 rpm depends on the specific turbine design and the water height. Proper calculations and specifications are necessary to determine the optimal nozzle diameter and tank height.
ecm00
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a tank filled with water on the top of a pipe (height of water = h)
there's a hole in the bottom of the tank, so that when the hole is suddenly opened, water will flow in the pipe of length 20 meters
at the bottom of the pipe, there's a nozzle (I don't know how to choose the right nozzle diameter in order not to restrict water flow, and to increase water speed)
the jet from the nozzle will hit a pelton turbine of 20 cm diameter

I want to get about 1000 rpm from the turbine. How can I choose the height of water in the tank and the nozzle diameter? Is 1000 rpm achievable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ecm00 said:
at the bottom of the pipe, there's a nozzle (I don't know how to choose the right nozzle diameter in order not to restrict water flow, and to increase water speed)

any sort of nozzle is going to restrict the flow, can't be any other way that I can see. The least restriction is when the outlet diameter of the pipe is unchanged

Dave
 
thx!
so how should I choose the diameter of my nozzle? how to reach 1000 rpm?
 
ecm00 said:
thx!
so how should I choose the diameter of my nozzle? how to reach 1000 rpm?

Thats beyond my knowledge, I don't know if it can be done or not.

D
 
That depends on the spec of your turbine, whatever it's attached to, and the "h" of your tank.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top