B Fluid Continuity Equation in different reference frame

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the continuity equation in fluid dynamics, specifically regarding changes in fluid velocity and cross-sectional area. When fluid velocity increases, the area must decrease to maintain continuity, but switching to a different reference frame complicates this relationship. The key point is that the area constriction is relative to the tube's reference frame, not an arbitrary frame of reference. Understanding this is crucial for correctly applying the continuity equation. The derivation of the continuity equation clarifies these relationships and resolves the apparent violation.
versine
Messages
24
Reaction score
5
If I have fluid with area 10 and velocity 10, if the velocity increases to 20 the area will become 5. But if we switch to a reference frame moving at velocity 1 opposite this motion, then it would be 10 and 11 to 5 and 21, violating the continuity equation. What is wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I understand what you ask correctly, the area is constricted because the fluid is moving through some tube. If that's the case, it's the velocity relative to the tube's reference frame that counts. You will see why if you follow the derivation of the continuity equation.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and versine
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top