Fluid mechanics: defition of shear flow [rate of deformation tensor]

AI Thread Summary
Shear flow in fluid mechanics is defined by the rate of deformation tensor having only off-diagonal elements, indicating a pure shear condition. The diagonal elements correspond to the partial derivatives of velocity components in their respective directions, while off-diagonal elements represent shear rates. In the provided velocity field, the trigonometric functions do not directly determine shear flow but influence the spatial variation of velocity components. For a flow to be classified as shear flow, the diagonal elements must be zero, confirming that the flow is purely shear. Understanding these concepts is essential for mastering fluid mechanics in chemical engineering.
kd215
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
fluid mechanics: defition of "shear flow" [rate of deformation tensor]

I'm studying old undergraduate chemical engineering notes for an exam in grad school. Can't recall what this really means, can anyone explain to me what "off-diagonal elements" means and why the trig function velocities would be or not be "off-diagonal elements". And can you explain what the question is talking about in general.

Problem statement: Consider the velocity field u = ([/x],[/y],[/z]), where: [/x](x,y,z)=constant*y*z*sin(constant*x)...(similar functions for y and z velocities)

and question: "Recall that the definition of "shear flow" is one for which the rate of deformation tensor [Δ][/ij] has only off-diagonal elements. Is this shear flow?" (y or n)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


And those are velocities like u (sub x,y,z) just in each direction. Not sure how to write the notation in the posts
 


If you are a chemical engineer, your first step should be to go back to Bird, Stewart, and Lightfoot, and look up the definition of the rate of deformation tensor. The components of the rate of deformation tensor in cartesian coordinates can be arranged in a 3x3 matrix. The diagonal elements of this matrix are equal to the partial derivatives of the three velocity components with respect to distance in the coordinate direction of the velocity components. If these three components of the matrix are equal to zero, the flow is considered to be a pure shear flow. The rate of deformation tensor does not specifically relate to the trigonometric functions, although, for a particular flow in which the spatial variation of the velocity components are expressed in terms of the trigonometric functions, they will of course come into play.
 


Welcome to Physics Forums, KD215.

As regards to your queries about posting in the forum, you have obviously noticed the quick symbols on the right of the edit box.

Have you also seen the formatting option icons on the toolbar above the box?

Subscript and superscript can be accessed from the X2 and X2 icons.

A wider range of maths and other symbols are available by clicking on the Ʃ at the end.

This forum recognises a form of typographical language or input called LaTex. You access this in a wisywig mode by obtainign a free or commercial program to enter it directly.
I (try to) use Mathtype.

As regards the technical part of your question. There are several mechanical properties that have the principal or normal property as diagonal elements of their matrix or tensor and other properties (parallel or cross products) as off diagonal. Examples as Inertia, stress, strain, displacement.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top