Fluid mechanics — Question about this vector diagram

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around understanding two vector diagrams related to fluid mechanics, specifically regarding the definitions and implications of the force due to pressure, denoted as dFs. The left diagram represents a streamtube, while the right diagram assumes zero original pressure, leading to different interpretations of the forces involved. Participants debate the calculation of net force parallel to the streamline, with initial calculations yielding dAdp/2, though some suggest it should be 2dAdp/3 based on varying pressure across concentric annuli. The importance of checking assumptions about the geometry of the diagrams is emphasized, particularly when the radius at the narrow end approaches zero. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of analyzing fluid forces in different configurations.
denniszhao
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
why is dF=1/2dpdA (at the bottom right of the pic)
Relevant Equations
F=pA
where F is force, p is pressure and A is area.
3E4337EF-2818-49A5-AF04-27A1BF6AABF1.jpg
7FA2B12FF27F659B8F8CE09E3C7C2C62.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll need to explain a few things first.
Describe what is going on the right hand diagram.
Is the left hand diagram for the same set up or a different situation?
How exactly is dFs defined?
 
haruspex said:
You'll need to explain a few things first.
Describe what is going on the right hand diagram.
Is the left hand diagram for the same set up or a different situation?
How exactly is dFs defined?

Sorry for not providing more details.

1577401703450.png

1577401728023.png
 
haruspex said:
You'll need to explain a few things first.
Describe what is going on the right hand diagram.
Is the left hand diagram for the same set up or a different situation?
How exactly is dFs defined?

dFs is defined as the force due to the pressure on side walls. The left diagram shows the streamtube and differs from the right diagram which assumes the original pressure to be zero.
 
denniszhao said:
dFs is defined as the force due to the pressure on side walls. The left diagram shows the streamtube and differs from the right diagram which assumes the original pressure to be zero.
Hmmm...
In the left hand diagram the forces on the ends are pA and (p+dp)(A+dA), giving a difference pdA+Adp.
In the right hand diagram the difference is only Adp, no?
 
Last edited:
denniszhao said:
dFs is defined as the force due to the pressure on side walls. The left diagram shows the streamtube and differs from the right diagram which assumes the original pressure to be zero.
The author is looking along the streamtube from the narrow end. From that perspective, the side walls appear as an annulus of area dA. The author is taking the average pressure over that as dp/2, so ends up with dAdp/2 as the net force parallel to the streamline.
But I don't think that's right. If we consider that annulus as concentric thinner annuli the pressure near the thin end of the tube acts over a smaller area than at the far end. I would expect something like 2dAdp/3 as the net force. I'll try to check that.
 
  • Informative
Likes denniszhao
haruspex said:
The author is looking along the streamtube from the narrow end. From that perspective, the side walls appear as an annulus of area dA. The author is taking the average pressure over that as dp/2, so ends up with dAdp/2 as the net force parallel to the streamline.
But I don't think that's right. If we consider that annulus as concentric thinner annuli the pressure near the thin end of the tube acts over a smaller area than at the far end. I would expect something like 2dAdp/3 as the net force. I'll try to check that.

thanks it makes sense that the average pressure applied on the side is dp/2
 
denniszhao said:
thanks it makes sense that the average pressure applied on the side is dp/2
Yes, I just checked it and 1/2 seems to be right if we assume the difference in radii is small compared with the smaller radius. But it is something that needs to be checked. If you set the small end radius to 0 then it is 2/3.
 
  • Like
Likes denniszhao
haruspex said:
Yes, I just checked it and 1/2 seems to be right if we assume the difference in radii is small compared with the smaller radius. But it is something that needs to be checked. If you set the small end radius to 0 then it is 2/3.

Thank you so much! It is really helpful and I appreciate your patience and help!
 
Back
Top