Fluid mechanics: Some elementary concepts

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on fundamental concepts in fluid mechanics, contrasting particle and field descriptions through Lagrangian and Eulerian formalism. Key topics include the definitions of particle trajectories, streamlines, material curves, and streak lines, along with derivations related to inviscid flow such as Bernoulli's equation and various theorems. There is a debate about the inclusion of advanced topics like Luke's principle and Clebsch flow in introductory tutorials, with suggestions for a more engineering-oriented approach. The importance of foundational principles such as fluid kinematics, integral balance equations, and flow behavior at different Reynolds numbers is emphasized. Overall, the conversation highlights the balance between advanced theoretical concepts and practical applications in fluid mechanics education.
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
10,119
Reaction score
138
In this thread, I will explore some elementary concepts in fluid mechanics, starting with the distinction between a particle description and a field description (Lagrangian vs. Eulerian formalism).
I will continue by distinguishing between the concepts of particle trajectories, streamlines, material curves and streak lines.
Furthermore, I'll look into the basic derivations we may make with these concepts in inviscid flow, namely Bernoulli's equation, Crocco's theorem, Kelvin's theorem, Helmholtz' theorem for vortex lines,and the helicity theorem.
Lastly, I'll look into the assumptions behind irrotational, i.e, potential flow, the generalized potential flow known as the Clebsch flow, and the elegant principle known as Luke's principle of variation.

Quite a bit more to follow in a while..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am interested seeing some of this stuff if you're still interested in going through it.
 
arildno said:
In this thread, I will explore some elementary concepts in fluid mechanics, starting with the distinction between a particle description and a field description (Lagrangian vs. Eulerian formalism).
I will continue by distinguishing between the concepts of particle trajectories, streamlines, material curves and streak lines.
Furthermore, I'll look into the basic derivations we may make with these concepts in inviscid flow, namely Bernoulli's equation, Crocco's theorem, Kelvin's theorem, Helmholtz' theorem for vortex lines,and the helicity theorem.
Lastly, I'll look into the assumptions behind irrotational, i.e, potential flow, the generalized potential flow known as the Clebsch flow, and the elegant principle known as Luke's principle of variation.
Quite a bit more to follow in a while..



If you finally do this stuff, honestly I think your point of view should be a more "engineering oriented" one. I have been studying fluid mechanics during 3 years when undergrad and now doing the Ph.D. in aerospace engineering, and I have never heard about Luke's principle nor Clebsch flow. I'm pretty sure they exist and they are important, but I think they are not the kind of stuff you should include in a tutorial for giving the big picture of this science.

To my understanding a better guideline could be something like:

i) Fluid Kinematics: Eulerian description, Pathlines, Streamlines, Streaklines.
ii) Integral Balance Equations: Continuity, Momentum, Total Energy, Kinetic Energy, Enthalpy and Entropy. Incompressibility assumption. Vorticity Equation.
iii) Differential forms. Reynolds Transport Theorem.
iv) Non dimensional Relevant Parameters.
v) Flow at low Reynolds. Poiseuille and Couette Flows. Stokes Equations. Oseen's approximation. Hydrodynamic Lubrication.
vi) Flow at high Reynolds. Boundary Layer. Blausius Similarity Solution. Bernoulli Equation.
vii) Compressible Flow. Rankine-Hugoniot equations. Shock Waves and Expansion Fans.
viii) Classical Hydrodynamics. Surface Gravity Waves. Shallow Water equations. Flow over obstacles.
viii) Stratified Flow. Bousinessq approximation. Buoyancy frequency. Internal Waves.
ix) Turbulent Flow. RANS equations. Reynolds stress tensor. Auschtag Viscosity coefficient. Closure problem. Boussinesq approximation. Round Turbulent Jet.
 
Last edited:
Good ideas. I had quite forgotten about this thread.
 
Clausius2 said:
... I have never heard about Luke's principle nor Clebsch flow. I'm pretty sure they exist and they are important, but I think they are not the kind of stuff you should include in a tutorial for giving the big picture of this science.
Luke's variational principle is quite elegant and worth to mention especially when potential theory is on the scene. Even, variational calculus itself is a must for anyone interested in fluid mechanics. Finite element people are quite good at dealing with the variational form of the partial differential equations.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top