Fluids at Rest: Calculating the Force Required to Hold Wood Underwater

  • Thread starter Thread starter arpitm08
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluids Rest
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the force required to hold 0.5 m³ of wood underwater, the buoyant force (Fb) must be determined, which equals the weight of the displaced water. The weight of the water displaced is calculated as 9.81 N multiplied by the volume of water (0.5 m³), resulting in 4905 N. The weight of the wood is found by multiplying its density (770 kg/m³) by its volume, yielding 385 kg, which translates to a weight of 3783.5 N. The net force required to hold the wood underwater is the difference between the buoyant force and the weight of the wood, leading to a final force of 1128 N. Accurate calculations are essential for solving fluid dynamics problems effectively.
arpitm08
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Fluids at rest problem help!

Homework Statement


How much force does it take to hold 0.5 m^3 of medium density (specific gravity = 0.77) wood under water?

The Attempt at a Solution


density of wood is 770 kg/m^3.
Fb is the force of buoyancy that pushes the wood up.
F-Fb = mg
F-9.81(0.5)(1000) = 770*0.5 (9.81)
F = 8682 N

I don't know what the answer is, but i don't think that this is right. It might be i don't know. Could someone help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The force of buoyancy is the same as the weight of the water displaced. That force acts upwards on the weight of the wood. Therefore the force required to hold the wood underwater is the excess force from the weight of the water.

What you have done is worked out both weights but added them when you need to take the difference.
 
So Fb - F = mg
F = 1128 N
 
Thats correct.
 


hi I am just looking at this problem...how did you get 770*0.5 for the mass?
 


The volume of wood is 0.5 cubic metres, the density of wood is 770 kg per cubic metre (at least given in this question).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top