Fluids- Sphere dropped in ocean

AI Thread Summary
A solid aluminum sphere with a density of 2.7 g/cm^3 is dropped into ocean water, which has a density of approximately 1.03 g/cm^3. The net force acting on the sphere is calculated using the equation Fnet = mg - ρfVfg, where the volume is the displaced volume of the sphere. The discussion reveals confusion regarding the relationship between the apparent weight and actual weight of the sphere, leading to a calculated ratio of 0.6185. It is noted that while the mass remains constant, the weight reduction affects the sphere's acceleration, which changes with depth due to the pressure dynamics, although pressure is assumed constant around the sphere. The conversation emphasizes the need to clarify how the weight reduction influences acceleration despite constant density assumptions.
allykat
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




A solid sphere of aluminum (density 2.7 g/cm^3) is gently dropped into a deep ocean. (The density of ocean water is approximately 1.03 g/cm^3.) Calculate the sphere's acceleration at the point where it is completely submerged into the ocean. As the sphere drops deeper, does the acceleration increase or decrease compared to the acceleration beneath the surface?

Homework Equations


Knowing that density = ρfVfg and that mg is greater that this, the Fnet equation becomes
Fnet= mg-ρfVfg where the volume is also the volume displaced by the sphere

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay so I attempted to find the ratio of Wapp/Wactual which is Vsphere(ρsphere-ρwater)g/Vsphere(ρsphere)g so I could find a relation between the two such that I could find m in the Fnet equation, but I couldn't get really far with this approach. I know the acceleration changes though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Although your attempt at solution was apparently unsuccessful, it would still be helpful to post your calculations. There may be some error in calculation or logic which has escaped your attention, but which might be readily apparent to fresh eyes.
 
So I did Wapp/ Wactual= Vsphere(ρsphere-ρfluid)g/ (Vsphereρsphereg)= V(2.7-1.03)g/2.7Vg=
0.6185, but I do not know what to do with this result.
 
allykat said:
So I did Wapp/ Wactual= Vsphere(ρsphere-ρfluid)g/ (Vsphereρsphereg)= V(2.7-1.03)g/2.7Vg=0.6185, but I do not know what to do with this result.
You have an object of known mass. In air, its weight would lead to a certain well-known acceleration. You have found the weight to have been reduced by a certain fraction. What will that do to the acceleration?
I know the acceleration changes though.
Because?
 
Well, I'm not given the weight, only the densities, but I tried to calculate a relation by canceling out the volumes and g. The acceleration should change because the pressure changes with depth.
 
allykat said:
Well, I'm not given the weight, only the densities, but I tried to calculate a relation by canceling out the volumes and g.
I should have written Suppose you have an object of known mass...
If the mass stays the same but the weight is reduced by a factor, what will that do to the acceleration?
The acceleration should change because the pressure changes with depth.
Pressure is equal all around the sphere, so cancels out. You are to assume the density of the water is constant. Yet there is a reason the acceleration will change.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top