I Fluorescent lamps And Fan remote

AI Thread Summary
Fluorescent lamps can interfere with the operation of infrared (IR) remote controls due to the electromagnetic noise they generate. When the fluorescent lamps are on, this noise increases the noise floor, making the IR receiver less sensitive and reducing the effective range of the remote. In contrast, when the lamps are off, the remote works at a longer distance because there is less interference. This phenomenon highlights the impact of fluorescent lighting on electronic devices that rely on IR signals. Understanding this interaction can help users optimize their remote control experience.
Aryamehr
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone. I hope you are doing great . I recently saw something interesting and had a question. I use fluorescent lamps in my room, and when I use the remote fan, it works at a shorter distance, but when the lamps are off, the remote works at a longer distance. What do fluorescent lamps do that affects the operation of the remote?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This lamp !

1720522406311.png
 
Welcome to PF.

Aryamehr said:
What do fluorescent lamps do that affects the operation of the remote?
I expect the fan uses an IR remote control.
The switching of the FL causes IR, optical, or RF pulses, that are picked up by the IR receiver. That makes it less sensitive because the noise floor is higher.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top