Flux lines in diametrically magnetized cylinder

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the design of a wind generator's alternator, specifically regarding the use of diametrically magnetized cylindrical magnets and their interaction with air-core coils. The original poster seeks clarification on whether mounting coils beneath the circular faces of these magnets would be effective, as they initially believed that flux lines needed to intersect the coils at a 90° angle. A response emphasizes the importance of maximizing flux cutting through the coils for efficiency, suggesting that a core of iron and proper alignment with the magnet's poles are crucial. The poster acknowledges the need for axial magnets instead, which would simplify their design while still achieving sufficient power output for their project. Overall, the conversation highlights key considerations in alternator construction for effective energy generation.
Awfulwaffle
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone,

First I'd like to say my thanks to the community for all the information I managed to glean while lurking on the forum and doing my schoolwork over the last year or so. It's been an invaluable resource to me!

Now, on to my question. (I see that it says not to post homework questions, but I don't think this really counts as it's just a question about the properties of magnets). I'm a Mechanical Engineering student working in a team on a wind generator for class. We were given the option of building our own alternator, and I decided to give it a shot a bit ahead of time. I've got a general design in mind, a vertical axis generator with static coils and rotating magnets. When considering how easy and time-effective it would be to machine my rotor and mount the magnets, I decided to go with cylindrical ones. I've also decided on air-core coils of oval/elliptical shape.

Now, from what I understand the alternator will work best if I have the longer portion of the coil intersecting the flux lines of whichever magnet happens to be passing it at a 90° angle. My question is, if I use magnets with diametric poles

(eg this: http://www.magnet4less.com/product_info.php?cPath=1_133&products_id=653),

would I be able to get away with mounting my coils on the bottom of the housing with the circular faces of the magnet passing over them? My thinking is that since flux lines go from pole to pole this should work, but I fear that the effect will be much weaker than if the coils were mounted next to the rounded sides of the magnets.

Please excuse any misguided assumptions or misinformation on my part, all that I know regarding the construction of alternators comes from a few days of haphazard internet research. I hope someone can shed some light on this for me!

Thanks in advance!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
Hi
I'm really not sure what you are saying. If you want an efficient generator then you don't just wave a magnet near a coil. A good generator design tries to ensure that as much flux as possible cuts the coil on each half of the cycle. This is achieved by having a core of iron through the coil and a rotating magnet with as little clearance as possible between the poles the faces of the core as they rotate past it.. Any deviation from this will result in flux leakage and a poor performance. The reason for using a 'normally' magnetised cylinder for a magnet is so that the above criterion can be achieved. You need a 'low reluctance path'.
 
Thanks for your reply Sophie. I understand that there's a lot more to alternator construction if one is seeking efficiency. That said, I don't need mine to be optimal, I just need it to supply enough power at a relatively low rpm to charge some capacitors which will in turn light an LED. I think I was operating under the false assumption that the flux lines that needed to cut across the coils had to be between the two poles, not at the poles. It seems that I need axial magnets likes you said, which will actually simplify things a bit for me.

Thank you very much for your help!
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top