Flux through a Cube - Why would flux be zero?

  • Thread starter Thread starter limonysal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube Flux Zero
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric flux through a cube in a given electric field, with specific focus on why the flux can be zero under certain conditions. The total electric flux through the cube is determined to be ΦE = bL^3, indicating it depends solely on the variable b. In Part B, it is noted that if b is set to zero, the electric field becomes constant, leading to no net flux across the cube's surfaces. The participants explore whether the flux cancellation is due to equal inflow and outflow or the absence of generated flux, ultimately concluding that both statements are valid. The analogy of water flow through the cube helps clarify the concept of net flux being zero despite some flux being present.
limonysal
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is a three part problem. I have the first and third part down but I'm just wondering about the second part which is multiple choice.

A cube has one corner at the origin and the opposite corner at the point (L,L,L). The sides of the cube are parallel to the coordinate planes. The electric field in and around the cube is given by E = <(a+bx), c>. (im using bold for vectors)

Part A: Find the total electric flux \PhiE through the surface of the cube.
Express your answer in terms of a, b, c, and L.
\PhiE =bL^3

Part B:
Notice that the flux through the cube does not depend on a or c. Equivalently, if we were to set b=0, so that the electric field becomes
E = <a, c>,
then the flux through the cube would be zero. Why?

a. E' does not generate any flux across any of the surfaces.
b. The flux into one side of the cube is exactly canceled by the flux out of the opposite side.
c. Both of the above statements are true.


Homework Equations



\PhiE=\intover the surface E*dA= EA when the field is perpendicular

The Attempt at a Solution


I feel like the flux might be canceled out but I'm not sure if it might be both or just one of th reasons.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Imagine a cube-shaped region of space that happens to be in a flowing river. In a given amount of time, how much water enters one side of the space? In that same time, how much water goes out of the other side of the space? Are they equal or unequal? Would the net flow rate "in" be zero or nonzero?
 
if the water has been flowing through the cube before that instant of time, it should be the same.

If you say that b. is true, that the flux cancels, then does that contradict a. that states that there is no flux generated. But there is some generated, it just doesn't depend on x so it cancels?

i kinda feel like I am trying to catch clouds here.
 
ok. so if the electric field is not dependent on x, then the flux going in through one side is the same as that going out the other end. so there is no chage in the flow rate?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top