Fmax=36.4NWhat is the maximum force exerted on a bullet by a wooden block?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xstetsonx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Bullet
AI Thread Summary
A 10.0-g bullet traveling at 200 m/s strikes a wooden block and comes to rest 22 cm inside it. The maximum force exerted on the bullet by the block is being calculated, with initial discussions focusing on momentum and kinetic energy. The work done on the bullet, represented as the integral of force over distance, should equal the bullet's kinetic energy. There is confusion regarding the units of momentum and energy, with clarifications needed on the correct values. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using work and energy principles to find the maximum force exerted.
xstetsonx
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
A 10.0-g bullet traveling at 200 m/s strikes a fixed wooden block. The bullet comes to rest 22 cm inside the block. The magnitude of the force exerted on the bullet by the block over its 22-cm travel is shown in graph below. Find the value of Fmax.


my attempt:

p=mv=(0.01kg)(200m/s)=2J

(.22m)/(200m/s)=0.0011s

(0.0011/2)(fmax)+(.5)(0.0011/2)(fmax)=2J
----rectangle----------triangle--------total area----
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    3.2 KB · Views: 430
Physics news on Phys.org
Momentum is not measured in Joules.
 
oops i guess it is Newton then but besides that am i right?
 
No, it is not Newton either. Momentum doesn't have named unit.

Given force and distance it will be easier to calculate work done, not change in momentum.
 
may i ask how would you start it with work and energy?
i know you can get the kinetic energy but what is next?
 
xstetsonx said:
may i ask how would you start it with work and energy?
i know you can get the kinetic energy but what is next?

The integral of the force over the distance is the work done on the bullet. As you seem to be computing. Shouldn't that equal the kinetic energy of the bullet? Which is not 2J.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top