Force acting on the center of mass of a rolling disk

AI Thread Summary
A uniform disk is subjected to a force F at its highest point, leading to confusion about the relationship between angular and linear accelerations. The moment of inertia is calculated as MR^2/2, and the torque is determined to be FR, resulting in an angular acceleration of 2F/RM. The discussion highlights a critical point that the acceleration of the center of mass (c.o.m) is expressed as aR, but it is pointed out that the assumption of rolling without slipping is not stated. This raises questions about the validity of the derived equations and the conditions under which they apply. Clarification on the rolling condition is essential for accurate analysis of the forces and accelerations involved.
Fibo112
Messages
149
Reaction score
3
Hello. The following situation I thought out confuses me so I am wondering where my mistake lies.
A uniform disk of mass M and radius R sits on its edge. A string is attached to the highest point and pulled with a Force F in the x direction.

The moment of inertia of the disk is MR^2/2 making the angular momentum about the center of mass MR^2w/2 where w is the angular velocity. The torque about the center of mass seems to be FR. Since torque is the derivative of angular momentum we have FR=MR^2a/2 where a is the angular acceleration.
This means the angular acceleration is equal to 2F/RM. The acceleration A of the c.o.m is equal to aR, so it is equal to 2F/M, making the force acting on the body equal to 2F/M*M= 2F?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fibo112 said:
This means the angular acceleration is equal to 2F/RM. The acceleration A of the c.o.m is equal to aR
What makes you say that the acceleration of the center of mass is equal to aR? Nobody said that the disk was rolling without slipping.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top