Force and moment on submerged surface

boileroo
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am having trouble understanding problems involving the force and bending moment on a submerged surface.

The problem in question is as follows:

variation in density of a muddy lake is given as rho = rhoo + kh, where rhoo = 1000, k = 100 and h = depth of lake.

A vertical plate is used as a dam, and the depth of the water is 10m.

Find the force/meter width and moment/meter width.

My problem lies in part b, calculating the moment

The Attempt at a Solution



F = int(rho*g*y) dy = int((rhoo +kh)*g*y) dy = (rhoo*g*h2)/2 + (k*g*h3)/3 = 815.5x103 N

It is this next part with the moment I am struggling on. The formula i have been taught to use is:

M = int(r*P) dA

I think that this goes to M = int((rhoo +kh)(y-h) dy but am unsure why, if it is infact it is the case.
Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To calculate torque, you need to select a reference axis, because you get different answers depending on where you define "r" to be 0. Suppose you choose the bottom of the dam as your reference.

The moment exerted on a small section of the dam, of length dy and width w, would then be y*P*wdy: the distance from the reference axis, times the force exerted on the infinitesimal section. P is just rho_0+k(h-y), and integrating from y=0 to y=h would give you the moment.
 
thank you, I think that helps!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top