Force applied to dumbbell to CM and edge

AI Thread Summary
Applying a force to a dumbbell at its center of mass and at its edge yields the same center of mass velocity due to equal impulse, but the energy differs because the edge application results in rotation and translation. The confusion arises from the relationship between force, time, and energy, as energy gain is influenced by the distance over which the force is applied. When a force is applied at the edge, it imparts additional energy due to the rotational motion, despite the same impulse being delivered. The difficulty in applying the same force at both points complicates direct comparisons of energy and momentum. Ultimately, understanding these dynamics clarifies why energy differs based on the application point of the force.
Malabeh
Today in class we learned about how if a force F is applied to a dumbbell on its center of mass and then separately applied to the edge where it gets its maximum torque, the dumbbell will have the same CM velocity after. It makes sense when you think about it in terms of momentum. F times T gives the impulse and so it is the same in both cases. I get confused about its energy. The second case has more energy because it is rotating and translating...makes sense, BUT how can a force applied for a certain time give something more energy when it is applied to a different position? Also, in my mind I imagine the force being applied to the dumbbell in case 2 and it just rotates around that point because there is maximum torque. Obviously my thoughts are flawed, would anyone care to explain why? If you can provide mathematical proof that'd be great!
43814178af0ac6a7bac56b667bb5db02.jpg


EDIT: If I flick my pen at its center of mass, it goes across the table really fast, but if I flick it at the end, it spins and only has a minor transnational velocity. That seems counter intuitive to what my teacher said.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Change in momentum is given by impulse. Impulse is the integral of force over time. Change in energy is given by work. Work is the integral of force over distance.

The end of the dumbbell moves relative to the center of mass. If you apply the same force for the same time at the end of the dumbbell rather than at the center, you will have imparted the same impulse. But you will have imparted more energy because of that additional movement.
 
Malabeh said:
EDIT: If I flick my pen at its center of mass, it goes across the table really fast, but if I flick it at the end, it spins and only has a minor transnational velocity. That seems counter intuitive to what my teacher said.
It's not so easy to flick the end of the pen with the same force as you can flick the center of mass, since the pen starts spinning and the point of contact moves away from you more quickly. When flicking the center you are probably exerting a greater impulse--more force for a greater time.
 
Malabeh said:
BUT how can a force applied for a certain time give something more energy
Because energy gain depends on the distance the force is applied over, not the duration it is applied for.

Malabeh said:
If I flick my pen at its center of mass, it goes across the table really fast, but if I flick it at the end, it spins and only has a minor transnational velocity. That seems counter intuitive to what my teacher said.
How can you be sure you applied the same force over the same time in both cases?
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top