Force Calculation for Upward Movement in Car Crashes

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jaxson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Forces
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the forces involved when a car traveling at approximately 60 km/h impacts a small concrete step. Participants explore the calculations and implications of the upward force applied to the car during this impact, considering factors such as impulse, suspension dynamics, and the geometry of the wheel's motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the gravitational force acting on the car to be approximately 17692.87473 N, suggesting that any upward force must exceed this to lift the car.
  • Another participant argues that the force during the impact is very large but short-lived, suggesting that impulse may be a more useful concept than force for this scenario.
  • Assumptions are made about the height of the curb and the compression of the wheel, with a proposed method to estimate the upward velocity of the car after impact based on these parameters.
  • Some participants note that the car's suspension dynamics play a crucial role in how the car responds to the impact, with varying effects depending on the size of the bump and the speed of the vehicle.
  • One participant mentions that with smaller bumps, the car may not experience significant upward movement, while larger bumps could lead to more pronounced effects, including potential damage to the vehicle.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the impact of the concrete step on the car's movement and the forces involved. There is no consensus on the exact calculations or outcomes, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise dynamics at play.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of accurately calculating the forces involved, noting that assumptions about tire pressure, curb height, and the car's weight distribution significantly affect the analysis. The discussion acknowledges the limitations of theoretical models in capturing the real-world dynamics of such impacts.

Jaxson
If the front left wheel of a car traveling at approximately 60km/h impacted with a small concrete step, would any significant amount of force be applied upwards on the car? How would you calculate this force? I'm assuming that to lift a car into the air the force applied upwards on the car would need to be higher than the force due to gravity which I calculated to be 17692.87473N with a car of mass 1797.133kg.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread closed for Moderation. Please check your Personal Messages (PMs).
 
After the PM exchange, the thread is re-opened. Thank you for your patience.
 
The force is very large for a short time. It's probably easier to work in terms of impulse than forces, because it's hard to calculate how long the force lasts. When the wheel hits the curb, it compresses and rebounds. The length of the force will depend on such things as the pressure of the tire and height of the curb and radius of the wheel.

It's really hard to get any sort of accurate result from this. But we can probably get ballpark numbers by making some spherical cow type assumptions.
Let's say the curb is 10cm high and the wheel is 50cm. Let's say the wheel compresses inward by 5cm (I have no idea how accurate these numbers are).
Untitled.png

I make the assumption that the car forward velocity is redirected upward by an angle theta by the collision. The reason for this is because the wheel compresses until it won't compress anymore, and this happens when the front of the car is moving tangentially to the wheel.
We get:
##\sin(\theta) = \frac{40cm}{45cm}##
Let w be the vertical speed of the front wheel immediately after the wheel rebounds.
##w \approx \sin(\theta)*v_0 = 40/45*60km/h = 14.8 m/s##
Now, you have to consider how much weight is on the front wheel. Probably about half the weight at first, but lower as it collides. Any damage to the car chassis will tend to reduce the vertical motion due to crumpling. The truth is, it's very hard to get even an order of magnitude accuracy with pure physics, and you are better off running experiments.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    1.2 KB · Views: 694
The car will not be significantly slowed down as a result of this impact .

There is an effective centre of revolution located on the corner of the step and the wheel rolls up and around that centre .

The components of acceleration of the wheel as it rolls around the effective centre of revolution can be estimated from the known forward speed and the geometry of the wheel motion .
 
Jaxson said:
If the front left wheel of a car traveling at approximately 60km/h impacted with a small concrete step, would any significant amount of force be applied upwards on the car? How would you calculate this force? I'm assuming that to lift a car into the air the force applied upwards on the car would need to be higher than the force due to gravity which I calculated to be 17692.87473N with a car of mass 1797.133kg.
Bump and suspension dependent.
Something like a 2x4 and the car would drive over that with not much of a problem.
With a 4x4 sized bump. the suspension dynamics would again react quickly enough to not have the car rise very much. But chances of blowout and rim damage increases.
As the length of the bump increases, the forces from the tire and suspension being forced up, have no downward release and the car body would lift. more than before.
With no suspension, all forces are directed to the body of the vehicle.
The dynamic response of the suspension and car would have to be examined.
Maybe you have seen, maybe not as it was a few years back, an advertisement of a half ton truck traveling over a continuous set of bumps. The tires and suspension move up and down, but not the truck body. Of course, speed of the vehicle and bump placement has to be matched for this to occur.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
11K
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
6K