Force, Electric Field, and Positive Particle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the location where an alpha particle experiences no net force due to a charged line and a charged sheet. The relevant equations for the electric fields generated by the line and the sheet are presented, and an attempt to solve for the distance from the line where the forces balance is made. The solution indicates that the calculated distance of approximately 0.1592 m is above the line, as the electric field vectors act in opposite directions to the force on the positive alpha particle. The participant expresses uncertainty about the setup and the use of formulas. Overall, the discussion revolves around the application of electric field equations to find equilibrium points for charged particles.
Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A long line carrying a uniform linear charge density 50.0 microcoulombs/m runs parallel to and 10.0 cm from the surface of a large, flat plastic sheet that has a uniform surface charge density of -100 microcoulombs/m^2 on one side.

Find the location of all points where an alpha particle would feel no force due to this arrangement of charged objects.
Indicate this location as a distance from the line.

Choose an appropriate location of these points at a distance: above the line or between the line and the sheet.

Homework Equations



E = [1/(2*episilon_0*pi)]*(lambda/r) for wire

E = omega/(2*episilon_0) for sheet (Do I use this formula?)


The Attempt at a Solution



I don’t know if I set this up correctly or used the correct formulas.

E = [1/(2*episilon_0*pi)]*(lambda/r) + omega/(2*episilon_0)

0 = [1/(2*episilon_0*pi)]*(lambda/r) + omega/(2*episilon_0)

-omega/(2*episilon_0) = [1/(2*episilon_0*pi)]*(lambda/r)

r = (lambda)/(-omega*pi) = (50*10^-6 C/m)/[pi -(-100*10^-6 C/m^2)] = 0.1592 m ?

This distance would be above the line because the electric field vectors, which are in same direction as force vectors, on the positive alpha particle would be in opposite directions??

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks fine to me. Is something unclear?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top