Force Equations and Final Speed

AI Thread Summary
A 7.0-kg rock is subjected to a variable force described by the equation F(x) = 6.0N - (2.0N/m)x + (6.0N/m^2)x^2, and the task is to determine its speed after moving 9.0m from rest. Initial calculations using the kinematic equation for constant acceleration yielded an unreasonably high final speed of 1219 m/s. It was noted that the assumption of constant acceleration was incorrect due to the variable nature of the force. By calculating the work done on the rock through integration, the correct work value of 1431J was found, leading to a final speed of 20.22 m/s. The discussion highlighted the importance of applying work-energy principles for problems involving variable forces.
odie5533
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 7.0-kg rock is subject to a variable force given by the equation
F(x) = 6.0N - (2.0N/m)x + (6.0N/m^2)x^2
If the rock initially is at rest at the origin, find its speed when it has moved 9.0m.

The Attempt at a Solution


\sum F_{x} = 6 - 2x + 6x^2
ma=6 - 2x + 6x^2
a = \frac{6}{7} - \frac{2}{7}x + \frac{6}{7}x^2
V_{f}^2 = V_{i}^2 + 2*a*x
V_{f}^2 = 0 + 2(\frac{6}{7} - \frac{2}{7}x + \frac{6}{7}x^2)x
V_{f}^2 = 2(\frac{6}{7} - \frac{2}{7}(9) + \frac{6}{7}(9)^2)(9)
V_{f} = 1219m/s

That seems waaay too fast, and I think I should have used an integral/derivative somewhere since the force changes as x changes. I'm rather lost on this one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
odie5533 said:
V_{f}^2 = V_{i}^2 + 2*a*x
This kinematic equation assumes constant acceleration--not a good assumption for this problem.

Hint: How much work is done on the rock?
 
I think I have it now.
W = \int^{9}_{0} 6 - 2x + 6x^2 dx = 1431J
W = \frac{1}{2}mv_{f}^2 - \frac{1}{2}mv_{0}^2
1431 = \frac{1}{2}7v_{f}^2
v_{f} = 20.22m/s

Any improvement?
 
Looks good to me!
 
Thanks for the help. I've never done a problem like that, all the ones I've completed so far have used the kinematics equations. I guess I'll have to learn how to apply the work equations better.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top