Force of Bar on Wall: Calculating Inward Pressure

  • Thread starter Thread starter QuarkCharmer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Wall
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the inward pressure exerted by a beam on a wall, with the tension in the cable given as 1.32*10^4 N. Participants clarify the need to resolve forces into x and y components, emphasizing that the wall's reaction force must be considered in both directions. The correct approach involves using Newton's laws to find the components of the wall force, with one participant calculating the y component as 1700 N and the x component as 13000 N. A vector sum of these components yields a total inward force of approximately 17970.9 N. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly analyzing forces and torques in static equilibrium problems.
QuarkCharmer
Messages
1,049
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


How hard does the beam push inward on the wall?
yg.10.79.jpg


Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the tension on the cable is 1.32*10^4 N

From there I turned the weight and tension into x/y components and tried to add the x components, so that:
1.32*10^4cos(40) + 14700sin(30) = 17461.79 N

I don't understand why this is not correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
what is the weight and length of the bar?
 
Sorry, the bar is 8m long, and 1500kg.
 
There are no z components, only x an y components. The weight has a y component only. The tension force has x and y components. The force of the wall on the bar has x and y components. Use Newton 1 in the x and y directions to solve for the x and y components of the wall force on the bar. Your tension force is correct.
 
Thanks for taking the time to respond Jay,

That z component was a typo, I meant to say x-component.

I believe I did what you described above. I got the reaction force as shown in this image:
(increasing x is down an left)
35hlfue.jpg


What exactly am I doing incorrectly?
 
The reaction force at the wall is not directed parallel to the bar...that only occurs for 2 force members , like the cable. You'll have to include the componets perpendicular to the bar also. You also do not have to break up the components into forces parallel and perpendicular to the incline, although that is acceptable. But you can also look at just x and y (horiz and vert) components.
 
The bar presses on the wall at an angle (30° to the horizontal). Some of the force is directed downward (pushing the wall down into the ground), some is directed "inward".
 
Like this?
nb2osp.jpg

This solution of 13000 N is also incorrect.

I'm not sure what you mean by breaking it up into components perpendicular to the bar. I didn't think that I could use torque to find the force for this question.

Alternatively, 17461.8cos(30), my original reaction force that was angled to the wall, resolved into it's x component, produces 15122.36?
 
QuarkCharmer said:
Like this?
nb2osp.jpg

This solution of 13000 N is also incorrect.
that's the x component.. Now look in the y direction to get the y component.
I'm not sure what you mean by breaking it up into components perpendicular to the bar.
that is what you did in your post 5. It is not necessary to do it this way.
Alternatively, 17461.8cos(30), my original reaction force that was angled to the wall, resolved into it's x component, produces 15122.36?
No, that is the wrong way to do it. Your x component is now corrrect; solve for the y component in a similar manner using Newton 1.
 
  • #10
Okay, so:
mg-R_{y}-Tsin(80)=0
R_{y} =mg-Tsin(80)
R_{y} =1500(9.8)-(1.32*10^{4})sin(80)
R_{y} = 1700.54

So now my Y component is: 1700 N, and my x is 13000 N. Do they want the sum of the two for this "inward" force from the bar on the wall? It's not simply the x component as I initially thought.

Thanks.
 
  • #11
That should be T sin 10 for the vert comp of the tension force. Then once you correctly solve for Ry, you have to add them up vectorially (not algebraically) to get the total force at the wall, using Pythagoras.
 
  • #12
I get 17970.9 N from the vector sum of the two. Does that seem right? Now I need to go back and re-analyze how I am approaching these problems. I have no problems with torque and such, but this one, idk what my problem is. Thank you all for the help.
 
  • #13
Yes, 18,000 N.

These problems are generally all analyzed the same way...sum of forces in x direction, sum of forces in y direction, and sum of torques about any point, all = 0.
 
Back
Top