Force of friction and Torque problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem involving the relationship between torque and friction in a wheel system. The vertical intercept of the torque versus angular acceleration plot is given as 0.00176 Nm, and the distance from the center of the wheel to the bearings is 2 mm. The user calculates the frictional force as 0.88 N using the formula F_friction = τ_friction / radius. There is a debate about whether the vertical intercept can be equated to the torque from friction, with some clarification needed on the geometry of the wheel and its moment of inertia. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between torque, friction, and rotational dynamics for solving the problem effectively.
teqvexed
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I'm a new member here. I've encountered a lot of help from searching through this website! I've searched through several threads dealing with friction and torque on here, but still can't quite figure out this problem...

Homework Statement


A plot of \tau vs. \alpha has a vertical intercept of 0.00176 [Nm]. If the bearings are 2 [mm] from the center of the wheel, then what is the force of friction?

2[mm] = 0.002 [m]

Homework Equations


\tau=I\alpha + \tau_{friction}
F_{friction} = \mun (Though is this cannot be directly applied since we are dealing with rotational forces, right?)
\tau = Force x radius

The Attempt at a Solution


I know \tau_{friction}[Nm] = 0.00176 [Nm]
I am confused about the relation between frictional force and torque...

\tau_{friction} = F_{friction}[N] * radius [m]
F_{friction}[N] = \tau_{friction} / radius [m]
F_{friction}[N] = 0.00176 [Nm] / 0.002 [m] = 0.88 [N]



(Btw, I get "Database error
The Physics Help and Math Help - Physics Forums database has encountered a problem." after pushing Preview Post once in a while, this can't be normal right?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
teqvexed said:

Homework Equations


\tau=I\alpha + \tau_{friction}
This is correct. But you have not given us enough information. If you know the geometry of the wheel, you could work out I. You could then work out the torque due to friction. With that you can then determine the retarding force (assume the retarding force is applied to the ball bearings at 2 mm from the centre).

AM
 
Hi Andrew, thanks for the response.

There is no other information given, just the vertical intercept of \tau vs \alpha, and that the ball bearings are 2mm from the center of the wheel. I believe it may be inferred that the wheel is of uniform mass, thus I=1/2 MR^{2} though neither M nor R are given...

Is it correct to assume that the vertical intercept is equal to the torque from friction?
 
teqvexed said:
Hi Andrew, thanks for the response.

There is no other information given, just the vertical intercept of \tau vs \alpha, and that the ball bearings are 2mm from the center of the wheel. I believe it may be inferred that the wheel is of uniform mass, thus I=1/2 MR^{2} though neither M nor R are given...

Is it correct to assume that the vertical intercept is equal to the torque from friction?
Sorry. I was seeing "intercept" and thinking "slope". You have enough information.

The intercept gives you the value of \tau when \alpha = ?

AM
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Back
Top