Force of Gravity on the tip of a giant snowcone

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the gravitational force exerted on a point mass at the tip of a snowcone-shaped object. The problem involves using spherical coordinates to derive the force based on the cone's geometry and density. The user presents their calculations, arriving at a formula for gravitational force that incorporates the cone's dimensions and density. There is also a suggestion to explore the concept of superposition to account for the combined effects of the conical and spherical sections. The need for spherical coordinates is questioned, indicating a potential alternative approach.
m00npirate
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm studying for a physics exam and made up the following problem to practice. Since I made it up there is no way to check my answer and I would greatly appreciate any and all feedback.

Find the force of gravity exerted on a point mass m at the tip of a snowcone (portion of a ball cut out by a cone where the radius of the sphere = the length of the side of the cone) with constant density ϱ and radius R. The internal angle of the cone is pi/4 in both directions.
snowcone.png


Homework Equations


F = -GmM(r)/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I used spherical coordinates
M(r)=ϱV(r)

M(r)=\frac{-\rho}{3}r^{3}\theta\cos\phi

dM(r)=r^{2}\sin\phi dr d\phi d\theta

F=\int_0^{\pi/4}\int_0^{\pi/4}\int_0^R \frac{-Gm\rho r^{2}}{r^{2}} \sin\phi dr d\phi d\theta

F=-\frac{\pi}{4} Gm\rho\int_0^{\pi/4} \sin\phi d\phi \int_0^R dr

F=-\frac{\pi}{4} Gm\rho R(\cos0-\cos\frac{\pi}{4})

F=-\frac{\pi}{8} (2-\sqrt{2})Gm\rho R

Also, I can't think of any way to find F(d) where d is the distance from the point of the cone. It might just be wishful thinking though.
Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I might consider solving by superposition.

The sum of the conical solid and the spherical one.

For the cone you can sum the individual disks of dm = ϱ*a(x)dx and then add the spherical section calculated from the distance of the cone height.

I guess I don't see the need to use the spherical coordinates.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top