Force on 3rd Charge: Examining x-Component vs. x

  • Thread starter Thread starter eil2001
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Force
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the net force on a third positive charge located on the x-axis, influenced by two other positive charges on the y-axis. For part (a), the net force at the origin is determined to be zero, while part (b) yields a formula for the force in the positive x-direction. In part (c), participants clarify that the x-axis should represent values from -4a to +4a, while the y-axis should depict the x-component of the net force, F_x. Users are advised to plug in specific x values to generate the corresponding force values for graphing. This approach will illustrate how the force changes as the charge moves along the x-axis.
eil2001
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Here's a question from my textbook:
Two positive point charges, each of magnitude q, are located on the y-axis at points y=+a and y=-a. A third positive charge of the same magnitude is located at some point on the x-axis.
(a) What is the net force exerted on the third charge when it is at the origin?
(b) What are the magnitude and direction of the net force on the third charge when its coordinate is x?
(c) Sketch a graph of the x-component of the net force on the third charge as a function of x for values of x between +4a and -4a. Plot forces to the right upward and forces to the left downward.

I got (a) and (b) using F= k(q1)(q3)/(r^2) and components. (a) F=0, (b) F= (2kx q^2)/ ((x^2)+(a^2))^(3/2) in the +x-direction.

However, I don't really understand (c). The x-component of the net force is F_x = (2kx q^2)/ ((x^2)+(a^2))^(3/2) , but then do I plug in 4a, 3a, ... , -4a for values of x to get the graph? What are the axes? Are the "4a, 3a, ..., -4a" on the x-axis and F_x on the y-axis?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eil2001 said:
...
However, I don't really understand (c). The x-component of the net force is F_x = (2kx q^2)/ ((x^2)+(a^2))^(3/2) , but then do I plug in 4a, 3a, ... , -4a for values of x to get the graph? What are the axes? Are the "4a, 3a, ..., -4a" on the x-axis and F_x on the y-axis?

Thanks!

Yes, that's right.

On the Y-axis to plot the F_x in multiples of kq^2/a^2 (ie : let each division be equal to kq^2/a^2)

On the X-axis you have different values of x, namely -4a, -3a, ..., 3a, 4a (ie : multiples of 'a' from -4 to +4)
 


Your understanding of (a) and (b) is correct. For (c), you are correct in plugging in values of x from +4a to -4a to get the graph. The x-axis will be the values of x, and the y-axis will be the x-component of the net force (F_x). So, for example, when x=4a, the x-component of the net force will be (2k(4a) q^2)/ ((4a)^2)+(a^2))^(3/2), and so on for the other values of x. Then, you can plot these values on a graph with x on the x-axis and F_x on the y-axis. This will give you a visual representation of how the x-component of the net force changes as the position of the third charge changes along the x-axis. I hope this helps clarify the concept for you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top