Force on point charge caused by another point charge.

woprxcpe1704tks
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider two equal point charges q, separated by a distance 2a. Construct the plane equidistant from the two charges. By integrating Maxwell’s stress tensor over this plane, determine the force of one charge on the other.

I have the full solution, but I'm confused on one part. Where does the E=1/4pi...cos(θ)r come from? And by that I mean where does each component come from? I know about the 1/4piε0, but I don't understand the rest.

Full Solution
 
Physics news on Phys.org
woprxcpe1704tks said:
Where does the E=1/4pi...cos(θ)r come from?
Apart from the cosine, it is the standard electrical field strength from a point charge. The cosine then evaluates the component perpendicular to the plane.
woprxcpe1704tks said:
And by that I mean where does each component come from?
That follows from geometry.
 
There's a bit of confusion with the diagram which shows opposite signs for the charges, yet the vectors showing the individual fields are for two positive charges. The problem statement and the solution are for charges of the same sign.

Will the net field be parallel to the xy plane or perpendicular to the plane?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top