Force on table/chair rolling back

  • Thread starter Thread starter Entr0py
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Rolling
AI Thread Summary
When a force is applied to a desk while sitting in a wheeled chair, the chair rolls backward due to Newton's third law of motion. The force exerted on the desk creates an equal and opposite reaction force on the person in the chair, resulting in an unbalanced force that causes backward acceleration. Although both forces are equal and opposite, they act on different bodies, which explains the movement of the chair. The desk does accelerate, but its mass is typically much greater, making its acceleration less noticeable. This scenario illustrates a common misconception about action-reaction forces and their effects on motion.
Entr0py
Messages
102
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Today I was sitting in a chair (with wheels on bottom) and decided to apply a force to a large desk. While I applied this force with my hand, my seat and I rolled backwards. My question is why is this so? I was thinking that if my hand is object "a" then it exerts a force on the desk (object "b"), F(ab) while the desk exerts a force F(ba) on my hand. Now if these action-reaction forces are equal and opposite then why do I accelerate backwards (or away from my desk)? What I think happens is that I DO accelerate the table but why can't I see its acceleration?

Homework Equations


Newton's third law and ΣF=ma where F and a are vectors

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a common misconception. Even if actions reaction forces are equal and opposite, they are acting on two different bodies. The force you exert acts on the table. The table exerts an equal and opposite force on you. Hence for you, there is an unbalanced force acting on your body.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top