Calculating Upward Support Force on a Rigid Beam

  • Thread starter Thread starter guru
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Force
AI Thread Summary
A 3.0-meter rigid beam with a mass of 100 kg is supported at both ends, with an 80 kg student positioned 2.0 meters from one support. The weight of the student is calculated to be 784N, and the weight of the beam is 980N. The upward force exerted by support 1 was initially miscalculated, as the moments caused by both the student and the beam were not properly considered. The correct calculation involves using the equation (2x784) + (1.5x980) = 3xF, leading to the upward force at support 1 being determined as 751.33N after accounting for the total downward forces. Acknowledgment of the beam's weight was crucial for arriving at the accurate force exerted by the supports.
guru
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
A 3.0-m-long rigid beam with a mass of 100 kg is supported at each end. A
80 kg student stands 2.0 m from support 1. How much upward force does support 1 exert on the beam?

I first found the weight of the student to be 784N.
so 784N*2cm =F*3cm
F= 522.67N
is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, its not. I think you forgot to take the moment caused by the weight of the beam.
I think this is how it should be done:
(2x784)+(1.5x980) = 3xF
This gives us the value of F(Force on the other support)=1012.67N
Substracting this value from the total downward force(784N+980N) we get the upward force exerted by the support1 be 751.33N
 
DeathKnight said:
No, its not. I think you forgot to take the moment caused by the weight of the beam.
I think this is how it should be done:
(2x784)+(1.5x980) = 3xF
This gives us the value of F(Force on the other support)=1012.67N
Substracting this value from the total downward force(784N+980N) we get the upward force exerted by the support1 be 751.33N


Yes, I forgot to consider the weight of the beam.
Thanks.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top