Force Required to Maintain Conveyor Belt Speed: 7N

  • Thread starter Thread starter Antu Ghosh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Belt Force
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the force required to maintain the speed of a conveyor belt with sand falling at a rate of 2 kg/s and moving at a constant speed of 3.5 m/s. The initial calculation using the equation F = v × (dm/dt) yields a force of 7N, which is confirmed to be correct. However, some participants suggest starting with a different equation that accounts for momentum changes, raising concerns about treating mass as a variable that can be created or destroyed. Alternative methods are proposed to address the force exerted by mass entering or leaving the system with velocity. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying physics equations in real-world scenarios.
Antu Ghosh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1. Problem Statement:
Sand is falling on a conveyor at a steady rate of 2kgs-¹.The motor of conveyor belt is rotating so that the belt is moving at a constant speed of 3.5m/s.what is force required to maintain the speed of the speed of the belt?

2. Relevant Equation:
F=v×(dm/dt)

The Attempt at a Solution


F=(3.5)×2
=7N
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Antu Ghosh said:
1. Problem Statement:
Sand is falling on a conveyor at a steady rate of 2kgs-¹.The motor of conveyor belt is rotating so that the belt is moving at a constant speed of 3.5m/s.what is force required to maintain the speed of the speed of the belt?

2. Relevant Equation:
F=v×(dm/dt)

The Attempt at a Solution


F=(3.5)×2
=7N
Your numerical answer is correct. However I think you should start with ##F = \dot p = \dot mv + m\dot v##, and work from there.
 
tnich said:
Your numerical answer is correct. However I think you should start with ##F = \dot p = \dot mv + m\dot v##, and work from there.
Many, me included, object to that equation. In principle, it treats mass as something that can be created and destroyed, with momentum somehow being conserved. In reality, of course, it is entering or leaving the system to which p refers, and it may do so with momentum. The equation only works when it enters or leaves without momentum (as it does in this case).
 
haruspex said:
Many, me included, object to that equation. In principle, it treats mass as something that can be created and destroyed, with momentum somehow being conserved. In reality, of course, it is entering or leaving the system to which p refers, and it may do so with momentum. The equation only works when it enters or leaves without momentum (as it does in this case).
You raise a good point. What is your preferred way to deal with situations like this?
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
tnich said:
You raise a good point. What is your preferred way to deal with situations like this?
One way is to consider the mass change as exerting a force. If the departing/entering mass does so with velocity vΔm then the force that exerts is ##\dot mv_{\Delta m}##. So ##\dot{(mv)} = F_{applied}-\dot mv_{\Delta m}##, or ##m\dot v = F_{applied}-\dot m(v-v_{\Delta m})##.
Not sure that is the conceptually clearest, though.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top