Forced Oscillator where Damping is Negligible

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a mass-spring system with negligible damping. The user initially calculated the angular frequency (ω) and frequency (f) but arrived at an incorrect answer due to algebraic mistakes in simplifying the equation. Key equations include the relationship between amplitude, driving force, mass, and angular frequency. After receiving feedback, the user acknowledged the algebra error and successfully found the correct solution. The conversation highlights the importance of careful algebraic manipulation in physics problems.
Becca93
Messages
84
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Damping is negligible for a 0.139 kg mass hanging from a light 7.00 N/m spring. The system is driven by a force oscillating with an amplitude of 1.88 N. At what frequency will the force make the mass vibrate with an amplitude of 0.430 m? There are two possible solutions, enter one of them.


Homework Equations



A = (Fo/m) / (√((ω^2 - ωo^2)^2 + (bω/m)^2)
Damping is negligible, therefore b = 0, therefore
A = (Fo/m) / (√((ω^2 - ωo^2)^2)

ωo = √(k/m)


The Attempt at a Solution



So,
m = 0.139 kg
k = 7.00 N/m
Fo = 1.88 N
A = 0.430 m

A = (Fo/m) / (√((ω^2 - ωo^2)^2)
Rearranged to find ω, is

(ω^2 - √(k/m)^2)^2 = (Fo/m) / A
ω^2 = √((Fo/m)/A) + (k/m)
ω = √( √((Fo/m)/A) + (k/m) )

So,
ω = √( √((1.88/0.139)/0.430) + (7/0.139) )
ω = √( 1.77 + 50.3597)
ω = 7.22 rad/s

ω = 2(pi)f
7.22 /2(pi) = f
f = 1.49 Hz

This is not the correct answer and I have no idea where I'm going wrong.

Am I using the wrong equations? Are my calculations incorrect? Any assistance would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You simplified ##\sqrt{(\omega^2-\omega_0^2)^2}## incorrectly.
 
vela said:
You simplified ##\sqrt{(\omega^2-\omega_0^2)^2}## incorrectly.

How? I did the following:

√((ω^2 - ωo^2)^2)

Shouldn't the square root and the square cancel, leaving

(ω^2 - ωo^2)

ω^2 - (√k/m)^2

ω^2 - (k/m)

Resulting in:

ω^2 = √((Fo/m)/A) + (k/m)

Where did I go wrong?
 
After setting b=0 and moving some stuff around, you should have
$$A = \frac{F_0/m}{\sqrt{(\omega^2-\omega_0^2)^2}} = \frac{F_0/m}{\omega^2-\omega_0^2}$$My take was that you ended up with
$$A = \frac{F_0/m}{\sqrt{(\omega^2-\omega_0^2)^2}} = \frac{F_0/m}{(\omega^2-\omega_0^2)^2}$$ (compare to "(ω^2 - √(k/m)^2)^2 = (Fo/m) / A" which is what you wrote in your first post) which leads to the incorrect answer.

If you check the units on your result, you'll see they don't work out. That means you messed up the algebra somewhere.
 
vela said:
After setting b=0 and moving some stuff around, you should have
$$A = \frac{F_0/m}{\sqrt{(\omega^2-\omega_0^2)^2}} = \frac{F_0/m}{\omega^2-\omega_0^2}$$My take was that you ended up with
$$A = \frac{F_0/m}{\sqrt{(\omega^2-\omega_0^2)^2}} = \frac{F_0/m}{(\omega^2-\omega_0^2)^2}$$ (compare to "(ω^2 - √(k/m)^2)^2 = (Fo/m) / A" which is what you wrote in your first post) which leads to the incorrect answer.

If you check the units on your result, you'll see they don't work out. That means you messed up the algebra somewhere.

Ahh, yes, I see what I did. I did mess up the algebra without noticing. I had it straight in my head but not on paper.

Thank you very much for pointing that out for me. I've got the correct answer now.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top