Forces Acting on a Moving Hinged Bar

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ninjakannon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of a weight at the end of a hinged bar when released from an angle. The user initially attempts to determine the resultant forces and acceleration using basic physics formulas but encounters issues with the bar changing length during motion. A suggestion is made to apply the conservation of energy principle, where potential energy (PE) converts to kinetic energy (KE) as the weight falls, providing a more accurate model. The conversation also touches on how to calculate the x and y components of velocity using trigonometric relationships based on the motion's circular path. The user expresses interest in applying these principles to a personal project inspired by a game.
Ninjakannon
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Okay, so the problem. Say we have a bar fixed to a horizontal surface by a hinge, at the end of the bar is a weight, which is fixed so that it cannot move. The bar is lifted to some angle \theta and let go of. I'm ignoring air resistance and the weight of the bar.

I'm trying to calculate the velocity of the weight at the end of the bar by finding the resultant force on it and then using a = F/m, then v = u + at.
This is all happening in something I've programmed, so at set intervals I'll be recalculating the forces acting, then the acceleration and hence the velocity. The weight is then moved by the velocity (x and y components) and I draw a line from the weight to the hinge to indicate the bar.
I've said that the weight has weight W. Parallel to the slope the component of the weight is W*sin(\theta) will cancel with the compression of the bar pushing back up (as these will be equal, assuming the bar does not change length).
This leaves W*cos(\theta), the perpendicular component of W, as the force moving the system.

I then say that, in x and y components, this comes out to be:
Fx = W*cos(\theta)*sin(\theta)
Fy = W*cos2(\theta)This almost works: the motion is in the correct direction and looks great for some situations. However, the bar ends up changing length - and quite substantially in some situations.

So, what have I done wrong? What are the actual x and y components of the force moving the system?

Thanks in advance for any help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ninjakannon said:
Hi all,

Okay, so the problem. Say we have a bar fixed to a horizontal surface by a hinge, at the end of the bar is a weight, which is fixed so that it cannot move. The bar is lifted to some angle \theta and let go of. I'm ignoring air resistance and the weight of the bar.

I'm trying to calculate the velocity of the weight at the end of the bar by finding the resultant force on it and then using a = F/m, then v = u + at.
This is all happening in something I've programmed, so at set intervals I'll be recalculating the forces acting, then the acceleration and hence the velocity. The weight is then moved by the velocity (x and y components) and I draw a line from the weight to the hinge to indicate the bar.



I've said that the weight has weight W. Parallel to the slope the component of the weight is W*sin(\theta) will cancel with the compression of the bar pushing back up (as these will be equal, assuming the bar does not change length).
This leaves W*cos(\theta), the perpendicular component of W, as the force moving the system.

I then say that, in x and y components, this comes out to be:
Fx = W*cos(\theta)*sin(\theta)
Fy = W*cos2(\theta)


This almost works: the motion is in the correct direction and looks great for some situations. However, the bar ends up changing length - and quite substantially in some situations.

So, what have I done wrong? What are the actual x and y components of the force moving the system?

Thanks in advance for any help!

An easier way to do this would be to use the fact that KE + PE = Total Energy is a constant for this system. So if the weight started out at some height with no velocity before being dropped, that would give it a starting PE (do you know how to calculate that?). Then as it falls through its arc, it gives up PE and gains KE. The velocity is always along the arc, so that KE translates into horizontal and vertical velocity vector components.

Maybe try it from this perspective, and see if you get a more natural-looking fall.

BTW, this looks to be a work or personal project, or maybe upper division programming/simulation work. If it's simple homework, I should move this to the Homework Help forums. Can you say what this is for?
 
Thanks for the reply, berkeman.

This is for a personal project. I'm actually trying to get some fundamentals down before I attempt to create some frameworks; I played World of Goo recently and wondered whether I could produce some similar, although simpler, structures.Thinking about it, would your energy method also work for larger structures? I imagine so, at a glance.

The potential energy of the weight at its starting height would be PE = mgh. And KE = 1/2mv2. So Total energy, E = 1/2mv2 + mgh.

How would vx and vy be calculated, though, I'm not sure?
 
Sounds like a fun project. Vx and Vy are constrained by the hinge and rigid rod. The velocity vector will always be along the path of the weight, so around in a circle centered on the hinge (if I understood your explanation correctly). Just use the triangle formed by the hinge, the weight, and the point directly below the weight on the horizontal surface to give you the angles you need to use some trig to calulate Vx and Vy from Vtangential.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top