Forces on an inclined plane, kinetic friction How is this wrong?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving two masses on an inclined plane with kinetic friction. The user attempts to calculate the acceleration and tension but receives feedback indicating errors in their approach. Key suggestions include creating separate equations for the forces acting on each mass in both the x and y directions, emphasizing the importance of using algebraic variables before substituting numerical values. The need to accurately account for the normal force and the correct application of trigonometric functions is highlighted as crucial for resolving the problem correctly. Overall, the discussion underscores the importance of a systematic approach to solving complex physics problems.
neutron star
Messages
78
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


In the figure below, m1 = 3.8 kg, m2 = 5.5 kg, and the coefficient of kinetic friction between the inclined plane and the 3.8-kg block is μk = 0.26. Find the magnitude of the acceleration of the masses and the tension in the cord.

http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/2676/0541.gif


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



5.5kg*10=55N
38 sin(30)=19N
(19N)(0.26)=5N

55-T=5.5a
+ T-19-5=3.8a
_______________
55-19-5=9.3a
39=9.3a
(divide both sides by 9.3)
a=3.333
(plug 3.333 in for a)
55-T=5.5(3.333)
55-T=18.33
-T=-36.67
T=36.67

a=3.333
T=36.67

How is this wrong? It says I am incorrect, why?

a =___ m/s2
T = ___ N
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
neutron star said:

Homework Statement


In the figure below, m1 = 3.8 kg, m2 = 5.5 kg, and the coefficient of kinetic friction between the inclined plane and the 3.8-kg block is μk = 0.26. Find the magnitude of the acceleration of the masses and the tension in the cord.

http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/2676/0541.gif

I would personally advise keeping the equations in the form of algebraic variables (m1/m2/g/a/T), then solving for the variables. When you get to more complicated problems, doing all of the necessary algebra before plugging in numbers makes it easier not to make mistakes.

neutron star said:

The Attempt at a Solution



5.5kg*10=55N
38 sin(30)=19N
(19N)(0.26)=5N

55-T=5.5a
+ T-19-5=3.8a

You're rushing things a bit here. Make both x and y direction equations for m1. Make the +x direction along the plane of the slope going towards the pulley, and the y direction perpendicular to the slope.

The y direction equation for the box is:

N (normal force) - m1gcos(a) = 0
N = m1gcos(a)

The x direction for box m1 is:

T - m1gsin(a)-(μk)(N) = m1a1

For box m2:

m2g - T = m2a2


Now try combining, and then solve. (For this problem, assume a1 = a2, and the Tension is the same everywhere)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rock32 said:
I would personally advise keeping the equations in the form of algebraic variables (m1/m2/g/a/T), then solving for the variables. When you get to more complicated problems, doing all of the necessary algebra before plugging in numbers makes it easier not to make mistakes.



You're rushing things a bit here. Make both x and y direction equations for m1. Make the +x direction along the plane of the slope going towards the pulley, and the y direction perpendicular to the slope.

The y direction equation for the box is:

N (normal force) - m1gcos(a) = 0
N = m1gcos(a)

The x direction for box m1 is:

T - m1gsin(a)-(μk)(N) = m1a1

For box m2:

m2g - T = m2a2


Now try combining, and then solve. (For this problem, assume a1 = a2, and the Tension is the same everywhere)
I don't think it's possible to solve that without having a.

You have:

T-38sin(a)-(0.26)(N)=3.8a
+ 55-T=5.5a

It would be 38sin(a)-(0.26)(N)+55=9.3a
You can't put in the normal force because you need acceleration to solve m1gcos(a) and you can't get rid of that 38sin(a). I'm guessing you meant 38sin(30).
 
neutron star said:
I don't think it's possible to solve that without having a.

You have:

T-38sin(a)-(0.26)(N)=3.8a
+ 55-T=5.5a

It would be 38sin(a)-(0.26)(N)+55=9.3a
You can't put in the normal force because you need acceleration to solve m1gcos(a) and you can't get rid of that 38sin(a). I'm guessing you meant 38sin(30).


Yes, sorry for not clarifying. The (a) inside the trig functions stood for the angle (30), and a1/a2 were the acelerations.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top