Formula for sum of digits of a number

greg9381
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Any ideas on this? I googled it and got only answers inolving Excel, C++, etc...
A formula for finding the digit sum of a 2-digit number, or only a 3-digit number, would also be interesting.

I thought I had a start with this: For a 2-digit number xy, the sum of the digits = (\frac{x}{10})\lfloor + something. But I don't know how to isolate y.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
greg9381 said:
Any ideas on this? I googled it and got only answers inolving Excel, C++, etc...
A formula for finding the digit sum of a 2-digit number, or only a 3-digit number, would also be interesting.

I thought I had a start with this: For a 2-digit number xy, the sum of the digits = (\frac{x}{10})\lfloor + something. But I don't know how to isolate y.

Hey greg9381 and welcome to the forums.

The best way to answer this for any base is to use the DIV\MOD algorithm. This will generate each digit for each base-position for any base and then you can simply sum all the base-position components and get an answer.

You can apply this say for a number in base 2, base 16, or base 10. From the sounds of it, you want to apply this algorithm to base 10. Also I'm going to assume you have a whole number: if you don't just remove the remainder (term after the decimal point) and treat this result as a normal whole number.

Take a look at this:

http://www.cut-the-knot.org/recurrence/conversion.shtml
 
Well, I'm not very advanced (AB calc in high school) so I can't completely understand the article, but it seems to be a way to find the digit sum using a computer? To clarify, I'm wondering if it's possible to have a formula that can be done with pencil and paper, not computers.
 
greg9381 said:
Well, I'm not very advanced (AB calc in high school) so I can't completely understand the article, but it seems to be a way to find the digit sum using a computer? To clarify, I'm wondering if it's possible to have a formula that can be done with pencil and paper, not computers.

The basic idea is very simple and goes a little something like this:

Take a number n. Do the following until you get n = 0.

Set i = 1
Calculate a(i) = n MOD 10. Let n = n - a(i). n = n / 10.
If n = 0 then we are done. If not then increase i by 1 and go back to the previous step.

Then if you want the sum simply add up all the a(i)'s and that will give you your sum.

This is for base-10, but if you want to do it for any base then just replace 10 with the base you are working with.

Quick example. Let n = 231.

a(1) = 231 MOD 10 = 1. 231 - 1 = 230. 230/10 = 23 which is not zero so i = 2.
a(2) = 23 MOD 10 = 3. 23 - 3 = 20. 20/10 = 2 which is not zero so i = 3.
a(3) = 2 MOD 10 = 2, 2-2 = 0, 0/10 = 0 so we stop.

Now add up all a(i)'s to get a(1) + a(2) +a(3) = 1 + 3 + 2 = 5 which is what we expect.
 
I got it.

About thirty minutes of non-continuous free time and a half sheet of paper gave me this:
For any whole number "x":
1 digit: x
2 digits: (\left\lfloor\frac{x}{10}\right\rfloor) + (x -10(\left\lfloor\frac{x}{10}\right\rfloor))
...

After awhile, I realized I could combine like terms, and this is what I got:

x - 9(\left\lfloor\frac{x}{10}\right\rfloor) - 9(\left\lfloor\frac{x}{100}\right\rfloor) - 9(\left\lfloor\frac{x}{1000}\right\rfloor) - 9(\left\lfloor\frac{x}{10000}\right\rfloor) ...

For powers of ten where \frac{x}{10^{n}} is less than 1, those items become 0.

To use this formula quickly, you may wish to use decimals and do the floor function in your head.

i.e.: Find the sum of the digits of 345854:
345854 - 9(34585) - 9(3458) - 9(345) - 9(34) - 9(3) = 29
 
Perfect! So it could be expressed as this:
latex.codecogs.com/gif.latex?x%20-%209\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}{\left%20\lfloor%20\frac{x}{10^n}%20\right%20\rfloor}
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top