Formula for sum of digits of a number

greg9381
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Any ideas on this? I googled it and got only answers inolving Excel, C++, etc...
A formula for finding the digit sum of a 2-digit number, or only a 3-digit number, would also be interesting.

I thought I had a start with this: For a 2-digit number xy, the sum of the digits = (\frac{x}{10})\lfloor + something. But I don't know how to isolate y.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
greg9381 said:
Any ideas on this? I googled it and got only answers inolving Excel, C++, etc...
A formula for finding the digit sum of a 2-digit number, or only a 3-digit number, would also be interesting.

I thought I had a start with this: For a 2-digit number xy, the sum of the digits = (\frac{x}{10})\lfloor + something. But I don't know how to isolate y.

Hey greg9381 and welcome to the forums.

The best way to answer this for any base is to use the DIV\MOD algorithm. This will generate each digit for each base-position for any base and then you can simply sum all the base-position components and get an answer.

You can apply this say for a number in base 2, base 16, or base 10. From the sounds of it, you want to apply this algorithm to base 10. Also I'm going to assume you have a whole number: if you don't just remove the remainder (term after the decimal point) and treat this result as a normal whole number.

Take a look at this:

http://www.cut-the-knot.org/recurrence/conversion.shtml
 
Well, I'm not very advanced (AB calc in high school) so I can't completely understand the article, but it seems to be a way to find the digit sum using a computer? To clarify, I'm wondering if it's possible to have a formula that can be done with pencil and paper, not computers.
 
greg9381 said:
Well, I'm not very advanced (AB calc in high school) so I can't completely understand the article, but it seems to be a way to find the digit sum using a computer? To clarify, I'm wondering if it's possible to have a formula that can be done with pencil and paper, not computers.

The basic idea is very simple and goes a little something like this:

Take a number n. Do the following until you get n = 0.

Set i = 1
Calculate a(i) = n MOD 10. Let n = n - a(i). n = n / 10.
If n = 0 then we are done. If not then increase i by 1 and go back to the previous step.

Then if you want the sum simply add up all the a(i)'s and that will give you your sum.

This is for base-10, but if you want to do it for any base then just replace 10 with the base you are working with.

Quick example. Let n = 231.

a(1) = 231 MOD 10 = 1. 231 - 1 = 230. 230/10 = 23 which is not zero so i = 2.
a(2) = 23 MOD 10 = 3. 23 - 3 = 20. 20/10 = 2 which is not zero so i = 3.
a(3) = 2 MOD 10 = 2, 2-2 = 0, 0/10 = 0 so we stop.

Now add up all a(i)'s to get a(1) + a(2) +a(3) = 1 + 3 + 2 = 5 which is what we expect.
 
I got it.

About thirty minutes of non-continuous free time and a half sheet of paper gave me this:
For any whole number "x":
1 digit: x
2 digits: (\left\lfloor\frac{x}{10}\right\rfloor) + (x -10(\left\lfloor\frac{x}{10}\right\rfloor))
...

After awhile, I realized I could combine like terms, and this is what I got:

x - 9(\left\lfloor\frac{x}{10}\right\rfloor) - 9(\left\lfloor\frac{x}{100}\right\rfloor) - 9(\left\lfloor\frac{x}{1000}\right\rfloor) - 9(\left\lfloor\frac{x}{10000}\right\rfloor) ...

For powers of ten where \frac{x}{10^{n}} is less than 1, those items become 0.

To use this formula quickly, you may wish to use decimals and do the floor function in your head.

i.e.: Find the sum of the digits of 345854:
345854 - 9(34585) - 9(3458) - 9(345) - 9(34) - 9(3) = 29
 
Perfect! So it could be expressed as this:
latex.codecogs.com/gif.latex?x%20-%209\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}{\left%20\lfloor%20\frac{x}{10^n}%20\right%20\rfloor}
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top