Four bodies connected through a sheave

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chemist@
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    bodies
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on applying Newton's second law to a system of four bodies connected by a string through a sheave, with the focus on understanding tension in the string. The initial attempt incorrectly assumed uniform tension throughout the string, leading to confusion in deriving the correct equations of motion. It was clarified that the tension varies between different sections of the string due to the presence of masses, meaning each segment can have different tension values. The correct approach involves analyzing the forces acting on each body individually while considering their respective accelerations and tensions. Ultimately, the resolution emphasizes the importance of recognizing variable tension in a system with multiple connected masses.
Chemist@
Messages
115
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Three bodies with masses m1 m2 and m3 connected with a string through a sheave with a body with mass m4. The system is moving right. Write the second Newton law for the movement of the objects. Ignore friction.

Homework Equations


2nd law for bodies:
m4a= m4g-T(the force of stretching the string)
m1a= T
m2a= T
m3a= T

The Attempt at a Solution


By summing up the last three equation I got:
a(m1+m2+m3)=3T but it is apparently incorrect. The book equation is:
a(m1+m2+m3)=T, how? Where am I wrong at?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    3.4 KB · Views: 501
Physics news on Phys.org
You want to ask yourself if T is really the same in the various sections.
 
Could you elaborate please?
 
Chemist@ said:
Could you elaborate please?

I believe what BvU is alluding to is that you are assuming that all sections of the string have the same tension.

Chemist@ said:

Homework Equations


2nd law for bodies:
m4a= m4g-T(the force of stretching the string)
m1a= T
m2a= T
m3a= T

While that is often true for a massless string when ignoring friction, it doesn't apply here because the string has masses attached to it. In other words, the tension of the string between bodies m1 and m2 is a different value than the tension between bodies m2 and m3 and so on.

You can still exploit the idea of tension though, just pick one of the tensions. The books seems to have picked the tension in the string at rightmost side, that passes through the sheave. Don't forget that the three leftmost bodies move together as a group.
 
If the left block feels tension T1 and is accelerated with acceleration T1/m1, the next block feels tension T1 working to the left. If that block is also accelerated with acceleration a, the net force on block 2 must be m2a. So it feels a Tension T2 to the right for which m2a = T2-T1.

et cetera
 
I see. When they all add up I get T3. Thank you very much.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top