Fourier components of vector potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of the coefficients a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t) and \bar{a}^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t) in the equation for the vector potential. There is confusion regarding whether these coefficients are complex or real, particularly since the text suggests that the bar indicates complex conjugates. It is noted that Fourier coefficients are typically complex, as they arise from the Fourier transform of functions. The consensus leans towards the idea that the coefficients must be complex due to the complex nature of the basis vectors \mathbf{e}^{(1)}(\mathbf{k}) and \mathbf{e}^{(-1)}(\mathbf{k}). Ultimately, the discussion highlights the complexity of understanding vector potentials in electromagnetic field quantization.
dkin
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I was reading the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quanti...d#Electromagnetic_field_and_vector_potential" and I am a little bit confused.

In this equation defining the vector potential

\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r}, t) = \sum_\mathbf{k}\sum_{\mu=-1,1} \left( \mathbf{e}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k}) a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t) \, e^{i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}} + \bar{\mathbf{e}}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k}) \bar{a}^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t) \, e^{-i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}} \right)

are the a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t) and \bar{a}^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t) complex or real?

On my first reading I assumed complex as the text says the bar indicates complex conjugates but the vector potential is later defined as a linear addition with complex \mathbf{e}^{(1)}(\mathbf{k}) and \mathbf{e}^{(-1)}(\mathbf{k}) basis vectors so why would these vectors have complex multipliers? They are also not in bold font which would indicate scalers.

Is the bar in this case simply a label for the scaler?

Please help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Fourier coefficients of a function are generally complex, because they are the Fourier transform of the function.
 
atyy said:
Fourier coefficients of a function are generally complex, because they are the Fourier transform of the function.

Thanks for the reply, I think the Fourier coefficients will be complex regardless as the \mathbf{e}^{(1)}(\mathbf{k}) and \mathbf{e}^{(-1)}(\mathbf{k}) vectors are complex therefore \mathbf{e}^{(1)}(\mathbf{k}) a^{(1)}_\mathbf{k}(t) should be complex regardless of whether a^{(1)}_\mathbf{k}(t) is.. I think.
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top