MHB Fourier Cosine Series: Equivalence for {x}

Joystar77
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
2. Fourier cosine series correspondence for f(x)= x, o < x < pi given by x ~ pi / 2 - 4/n, E infinity on top and n=1 on bottom. cos (an-1)/x / (2n-1)squared, (0 < x < pi).

Explain why this correspondence is actually an equality for 0 is less than or equal to x and x is less than or equal to pi. Then explain how we can write

{x} = pi /2 - 4 / n E infinity on top and n=1 on bottom

cos (2n - 1)x/ (2n-1) squared, (-n is less than or equal to x and x is less than or equal to pi)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, I forgot to mention in the original thread that I am totally lost and don't know where to start at with this problem.
 
Here is the above problem and I hope that its easier to read. I used some Mathematical symbols, so hope that you can understand it. Any questions, then please ask me if your unable to understand or read the problem.

Fourier cosine series correspondence for f (x) = x, o < x < Pie given by x ~ Pie / 2 – 4 / n

∑_(n=1)^∞▒cos⁡〖(2n-1)x/(2n-1)〗 〖^2〗,(o<x<Pie)

Explain why this correspondence is actually an equality for 0 ≤ x ≤ Pie. Then explain how we can write

[x] = Pie / 2 – 4 / n ∑_(n=1)^∞▒cos⁡〖(2n-1)x/(2n-1)〗 〖^2〗 ( -n ≤ x ≤ Pie)
 
Joystar1977 said:
Here is the above problem and I hope that its easier to read. I used some Mathematical symbols, so hope that you can understand it. Any questions, then please ask me if your unable to understand or read the problem.

Fourier cosine series correspondence for f (x) = x, o < x < Pie given by x ~ Pie / 2 – 4 / n

∑_(n=1)^∞▒cos⁡〖(2n-1)x/(2n-1)〗 〖^2〗,(o<x<Pie)

Explain why this correspondence is actually an equality for 0 ≤ x ≤ Pie. Then explain how we can write

[x] = Pie / 2 – 4 / n ∑_(n=1)^∞▒cos⁡〖(2n-1)x/(2n-1)〗 〖^2〗 ( -n ≤ x ≤ Pie)
http://mathhelpboards.com/math-notes-49/fourier-series-integral-transform-notes-2860.html
 
Thanks! I will take a look at these Fourier Series Integral Transform Notes.

dwsmith said:
http://mathhelpboards.com/math-notes-49/fourier-series-integral-transform-notes-2860.html
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K