Fourier series and draw function

karnten07
Messages
206
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For 0</= x </= pi, let f(x) be defined by

f(x) = { A for [x - pi/2] < alpha
{ 0 for alpha </= [x-pi/2]</= pi/2

Where A and alpha are positive constants with alpha <pi/2. I have used </ to represent less than or equal to. The square brackets are to represent single straight vertical lines.

Let f(x) be extended into an odd, periodic function of period 2pi. Sketch the graph of f(x) in the interval -3pi</= x </= 3pi, and show that the Fourier series expansion of f(x) takes the form

f(x) = 4A/pi {Infinity}Sigma(m=1) ((-1)^m+1)/(2m-1) sin(2m-1)alpha sin(2m-1)x

The part in bold should be sigma with infinity above and m=1 below

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


I see how to draw the function, i get y = A from 0 to pi at which point it drops to zero. Because it is odd and period 2pi it will be a square wave with three horizontal maxima (effectively) from x = 2npi - (2n+1)pi.

Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In doing the Fourier series expansion I am finding it difficult to write it in terms of the sum of integrals because of the limits to use.

What I am getting is sumthing like this:

2pi ao = INT(from (2n+1)pi to 2npi) + INT(from (2n+1)pi to 2npi) 0dx =

but I am thinking this is wrong. Should i be integrating between -pi and pi?

In that case i would get

2pi ao = INT (-pi to 0) 0dx + INT(0 to pi) Adx = 0 + Api

Im not sure I am doing this right because where does alpha come into it?

To see the question written more neatly here is the link http://www.personal.soton.ac.uk/mj2/Maths/MATH2015Problems_files/problems5.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top