Fourier Series of Periodic Function

he1senberg
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/824/50177563.png/
I need to find the Fourier coefficients and estimate the series for certain values of n. (4, 20 and 100)


Homework Equations


http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/839/32591148.png/



The Attempt at a Solution


I was unsure about what to do and found the equation above. So I used it and b coefficient was 0. I set the period 2L as 3, and set -L -3/2 and L as 3/2. So the total value I found was
a0 + Σ(3/(n*pi) - 27/(2*(n*n*n)*(pi*pi*pi)))*sin(2*n*pi/3)+ 9*cos(2*n*pi/3)/(2*(n*n)*(pi*pi))*(cos(2n*pi*x/3)

I managed to get some result but I am not sure if my results are correct, as the graph of the function is discontinuous at the ends of parabola. So, do you think my answer is correct? If not, how can I fix it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have Mathematica crank out the integral, and it produced almost the same result. The only difference is that there shouldn't be 2 in the denominator of the last term.

What did you get for a0?
 
Thanks for reply.

I think a0 was 2/9 or 4/9, I don't have the paper with me right now. I think that last 2 should be 4. Other than that, do you think my procedure to deal with problem is correct? Because I couldn't really make sure that I solved the problem correctly.
 
Yes, your method sounds fine. It's just getting the math right now. a0 is the average value of the function over one period, so it should be 2/9.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top