Fourier transform and singularities

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the properties of the Fourier transform of a complex function f(t) and its behavior when analytically extended to the complex plane. It is established that while f(t) being square integrable implies that F(ω) approaches zero as ω approaches infinity on the real axis, this property does not hold in the complex plane. A counterexample provided is f(t) = e^(-t^2/2), whose Fourier transform F(ω) diverges as ω approaches ±i∞. Additionally, the relationship between the width of f(t) and the singularities of F(ω) is questioned, particularly regarding any simple rules connecting them. Understanding these concepts is crucial for analyzing the implications of singularities in Fourier transforms.
diraq
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Consider the Fourier transform of a complex function f(t):
f(t)=\int_{-\infty}^\infty F(\omega)e^{-i\omega t}
Here t and \omega are on real axis. Let's suppose f(t) is square integrable. Here are my questions:

1) Since f(t) is square integrable, so we have \text{limit}_{|\omega|\rightarrow\infty}F(\omega)=0. Now, if F(\omega) is analytically extended onto the complex plane, i.e., now \omega\in\mathbb C, then does the property \text{limit}_{|\omega|\rightarrow\infty}F(\omega)=0 still hold at infinity on the complex plane?

2) The width of f(t) and F(\omega) in real t and \omega domain respectively satisfy the uncertainty relation. When calculating f(t)=\int_{-\infty}^\infty F(\omega)e^{-i\omega t}, if the answer to the first question is "yes," then for different sign of t, the contour can be closed by half circles on the complex plane for \omega. To evaluate f(t), we only need to know the information about the singularity points of F(\omega) on complex plane. So, the question is: is there any simple rule of thumb relation between the width of f(t) and the position of the singularity of F(\omega) and the corresponding residues?

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
diraq said:
Consider the Fourier transform of a complex function f(t):
f(t)=\int_{-\infty}^\infty F(\omega)e^{-i\omega t}
Here t and \omega are on real axis. Let's suppose f(t) is square integrable. Here are my questions:

1) Since f(t) is square integrable, so we have \text{limit}_{|\omega|\rightarrow\infty}F(\omega)=0. Now, if F(\omega) is analytically extended onto the complex plane, i.e., now \omega\in\mathbb C, then does the property \text{limit}_{|\omega|\rightarrow\infty}F(\omega)=0 still hold at infinity on the complex plane?
No. The counterexample is the function ##f(t)=e^{-t^2/2}##. It has the Fourier transform ##F(\omega)=\sqrt{2\pi}e^{-\omega^2/2}##, which blows up as ##\omega \rightarrow \pm i \infty##.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top